Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

To vote ALPA or not too

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Ponchus pilot

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
140
Every time talks about unions come up on the boards we keep hearing the same negative comments over and over. The same rhetoric about how Delta had to give concession and how some other airline had their contract abrogated in court. We also keep hearing about how some non-union airlines management is so great and that there has never been furloughs, etc...Now I’ll be the first one to tell you that a union won’t fix everything and ALPA does not claim this. The above examples are only half truths by individuals who either don't have correct knowledge or would like distort the facts. I strongly recommend a book by Marty Levitt "confessions of a union Buster". You will see that all of this negative talk is straight out of management playbook. We also keep hearing from these same folks that unions have failed to protect workers in all instances as if there was a claim by any union to be able to fully protect employees from all things harmful to their profession.

A union is not a cure all but it sure beats not having a contract. Think about this scenario for a moment. What if all the majors were not unionized and 9/11 had happened. Do you think they would not have cut pay and benefits as they saw fit without having to negotiate with the union? Do you actually think that there would be such growth at the regional level? What about furloughs out of seniority and retraining? If management could do as the wished they would pay a 737 Capt. at DAL or UAL $60/hr (you know there would be guys lined up for the job and it has happened before), at that point would there be any need for the regional pilots at the current level?

As pilots we have always tried to save our jobs and profession. Another book for the newbie’s is “Hard Landing" by Thomas Petzinger and "Flying the Line II" by George Hopkins. I grew up in a family where my father hated unions (was management) so I had the same mentality. When I listened to certain media or read most of the news it was the same thing, unions are corrupt, mafia, or communists. The same rant went on while I was in college earning a business degree. Now I don't know about all Unions but I know a little about ALPA. As ALPA pilots we do not fall under the same regulations as other unions nor do we represent any other profession besides piloting. As I started to work in this industry (I have worked union and no union) and researched more on the subject I realized that there is more to it than meets the eye.

Once again ALPA will not make all your troubles go away. You the pilots group are ALPA. If the argument that ALPA won’t do anything is true, then why does management of many companies spent millions each year fighting unionization? If you and your union were so useless then management should not care about it as they could do as the wished, right?

Unfortunately when union talk comes up it turns into a personal attacks or talking $hit about another pilots company. We all take pride in our profession and the companies we work for. After all our hard work has had a lot to do with the position of our company and we deserve to be compensated accordingly. We need to leave the mine is bigger than yours attitude behind. What management has done successfully for years is to make a union look like an outside entity, where your union is made up of your pilot group only. The old saying is that management likes to take the “U” and the “I” out of the word UNION. I know it sounds cliché but it’s true. We need to realize that when we become unionized we are not being taken over by some foreign entity but rather becoming united.

It is human nature to look out for ones own best interest first. That is why you need the collective to level the playing field. Many of us have thought at one point in our career that we are god’s gift to aviation and that certain pilots in our company are not good enough and do not belong. The old saying is “You are only as good as you last landing”. Everyone deserves to have their job protected and you should only be judged by your peers and not an individual. Collective bargaining and having a contract has many benefits. One should leave the politics aside and look into the roots of why ALPA was formed and the transformation it has gone through the years. The books I mentioned above give you some great insight on our profession and ALPA (Hard Landing is hardly a pro-union book). Management spends Millions on law firms to fight you each year, spend a few bucks on some books. Even better attend the meeting and ask questions. It does not matter what conclusion you come up with, the least that could happen is you gained some additional knowledge. I wish everyone luck with their careers.
 
Why in the he!! do you have such a hard on for SkyWest going union when you don't even work for SkyWest? If it is our responsibility to fix your company, well, too GD bad. SkyWest is a good company that will become a living hell during the next 5 years if ALPA gets voted in.
 
Why in the he!! do you have such a hard on for SkyWest going union when you don't even work for SkyWest? If it is our responsibility to fix your company, well, too GD bad. SkyWest is a good company that will become a living hell during the next 5 years if ALPA gets voted in.


Ahhhhhh...okay? Care to expand on that?
 
Ahhhhhh...okay? Care to expand on that?


What part?

If it's about the contract timing, my bet is at least 5 years to get the first one, and it will be a step back from what we have. There might be some improvement in some areas but ther will obviously be retreats in others. If anyone thinks there will be a rush on managements part to put one together, think again, management already has.

But during the interim, since loyalty has been discarded by the pilot group, there will be enmass teminations to people that have shown siding with the union. All those on the OC, should probably have a really good second business going.........

Or, maybe not-
 
Every time talks about unions come up on the boards we keep hearing the same negative comments over and over. The same rhetoric about how Delta had to give concession and how some other airline had their contract abrogated in court. We also keep hearing about how some non-union airlines management is so great and that there has never been furloughs, etc...Now I’ll be the first one to tell you that a union won’t fix everything and ALPA does not claim this. The above examples are only half truths by individuals who either don't have correct knowledge or would like distort the facts. I strongly recommend a book by Marty Levitt "confessions of a union Buster". You will see that all of this negative talk is straight out of management playbook. We also keep hearing from these same folks that unions have failed to protect workers in all instances as if there was a claim by any union to be able to fully protect employees from all things harmful to their profession.

A union is not a cure all but it sure beats not having a contract. Think about this scenario for a moment. What if all the majors were not unionized and 9/11 had happened. Do you think they would not have cut pay and benefits as they saw fit without having to negotiate with the union? Do you actually think that there would be such growth at the regional level? What about furloughs out of seniority and retraining? If management could do as the wished they would pay a 737 Capt. at DAL or UAL $60/hr (you know there would be guys lined up for the job and it has happened before), at that point would there be any need for the regional pilots at the current level?

As pilots we have always tried to save our jobs and profession. Another book for the newbie’s is “Hard Landing" by Thomas Petzinger and "Flying the Line II" by George Hopkins. I grew up in a family where my father hated unions (was management) so I had the same mentality. When I listened to certain media or read most of the news it was the same thing, unions are corrupt, mafia, or communists. The same rant went on while I was in college earning a business degree. Now I don't know about all Unions but I know a little about ALPA. As ALPA pilots we do not fall under the same regulations as other unions nor do we represent any other profession besides piloting. As I started to work in this industry (I have worked union and no union) and researched more on the subject I realized that there is more to it than meets the eye.

Once again ALPA will not make all your troubles go away. You the pilots group are ALPA. If the argument that ALPA won’t do anything is true, then why does management of many companies spent millions each year fighting unionization? If you and your union were so useless then management should not care about it as they could do as the wished, right?

Unfortunately when union talk comes up it turns into a personal attacks or talking $hit about another pilots company. We all take pride in our profession and the companies we work for. After all our hard work has had a lot to do with the position of our company and we deserve to be compensated accordingly. We need to leave the mine is bigger than yours attitude behind. What management has done successfully for years is to make a union look like an outside entity, where your union is made up of your pilot group only. The old saying is that management likes to take the “U” and the “I” out of the word UNION. I know it sounds cliché but it’s true. We need to realize that when we become unionized we are not being taken over by some foreign entity but rather becoming united.

It is human nature to look out for ones own best interest first. That is why you need the collective to level the playing field. Many of us have thought at one point in our career that we are god’s gift to aviation and that certain pilots in our company are not good enough and do not belong. The old saying is “You are only as good as you last landing”. Everyone deserves to have their job protected and you should only be judged by your peers and not an individual. Collective bargaining and having a contract has many benefits. One should leave the politics aside and look into the roots of why ALPA was formed and the transformation it has gone through the years. The books I mentioned above give you some great insight on our profession and ALPA (Hard Landing is hardly a pro-union book). Management spends Millions on law firms to fight you each year, spend a few bucks on some books. Even better attend the meeting and ask questions. It does not matter what conclusion you come up with, the least that could happen is you gained some additional knowledge. I wish everyone luck with their careers.
Hey, why alpa was formed and what they actually are doing are two seperate things! Second, job protection is an illusion, it doesn't exist! You can't leave politics aside. alpa is JUST a business surrounded by TONS of politics....THEBEST
 
CFIT,

Have you seen the SAPA memo? That is exactly what happened the last time. Then after the ALPA drive fails there will be a statement to the effect that he wanted to give you a raise, but the compensation committee(part of the BOD) didn't feel the time was right.

I like working at Skywest, but when you've been here for a while you can predict management's reactions, because you've heard them before.

I was hoping it wasn't going to be that way this time around, but...
 
CFIT,

Have you seen the SAPA memo? That is exactly what happened the last time. Then after the ALPA drive fails there will be a statement to the effect that he wanted to give you a raise, but the compensation committee(part of the BOD) didn't feel the time was right.

I like working at Skywest, but when you've been here for a while you can predict management's reactions, because you've heard them before.

I was hoping it wasn't going to be that way this time around, but...
Not that I'm siding with management, but their hands are tied on this. The company could end up in trouble putting through pay and benefit increases during a union drive. I wanted to make sure mgmts reasons stated in the memo were valid, so I googled at bit and found at least one legal case that backs up their statement.

Does anyone know how long this drive will last or when we will vote?
 
What part?

If it's about the contract timing, my bet is at least 5 years to get the first one, and it will be a step back from what we have. There might be some improvement in some areas but ther will obviously be retreats in others. If anyone thinks there will be a rush on managements part to put one together, think again, management already has.

But during the interim, since loyalty has been discarded by the pilot group, there will be enmass teminations to people that have shown siding with the union. All those on the OC, should probably have a really good second business going.........

Or, maybe not-



Wow, doesn't sound like you think very highly of management at SKY if you think they will be that vindictive?!
 
Why in the he!! do you have such a hard on for SkyWest going union when you don't even work for SkyWest? If it is our responsibility to fix your company, well, too GD bad. SkyWest is a good company that will become a living hell during the next 5 years if ALPA gets voted in.

No,where did I mention skywest, you assumed it was. The post is to open peoples eyes to something different, or something they might like to learn as I did (I am not all knowing). It started about negatives sayers that say things without any fact. So all I see is the same old tired posts I thought we might try to avoid here. I guess a better name for the thread would be "Why we should support ALPA" when i said vote it meant voting for and supporting our union not a refference to skywest. Your descisions are up to your group and you will see what happens in the future. Good luck.
 
Last edited:
What part?

If it's about the contract timing, my bet is at least 5 years to get the first one, and it will be a step back from what we have. There might be some improvement in some areas but ther will obviously be retreats in others. If anyone thinks there will be a rush on managements part to put one together, think again, management already has.

If your management team is really as benevolent as you think they are, then there shouldn't be any problem in putting together a new contract. All they have to do is make new 70 and 90-seat rates and you've got a decent contract. Pretty simple. There's no reason to expect "retreats" in your pay or working conditions.

But during the interim, since loyalty has been discarded by the pilot group, there will be enmass teminations to people that have shown siding with the union. All those on the OC, should probably have a really good second business going.........

I hope your management team isn't that stupid. Anyone they fire will quickly get their jobs back, and the NMB will crach down hard on the company. Management will be very careful about terminating anyone during a union drive. Even the slight appearance of terminating someone due to organizing involvement will get the NMB involved.
 
If your management team is really as benevolent as you think they are, then there shouldn't be any problem in putting together a new contract. All they have to do is make new 70 and 90-seat rates and you've got a decent contract. Pretty simple. There's no reason to expect "retreats" in your pay or working conditions.


Why should they? This is their chance to start out with a clean sheet of paper, pay starts out at the bottom, no vacation, no pay for wx canc or mx canc, etc. Everybody thinks that a new contract biulds from were it is, when the truth is there is nothing gauranteed, ALPA has been convienetly deceptive on this.



I hope your management team isn't that stupid. Anyone they fire will quickly get their jobs back, and the NMB will crach down hard on the company. Management will be very careful about terminating anyone during a union drive. Even the slight appearance of terminating someone due to organizing involvement will get the NMB involved.


You're right they will not terminate anybody during the drive, I don't care what you do, you could take a leak on the CP's desk and still be OK. But if the drive is ratified, then watch out. The CPM is in effect until a new contract is made and even though it rarely happens now, the language can allow for it. Do you think if someone from the OC has little mistake (they happen) he's going to be around for long?
 
You're right they will not terminate anybody during the drive, I don't care what you do, you could take a leak on the CP's desk and still be OK. But if the drive is ratified, then watch out. The CPM is in effect until a new contract is made and even though it rarely happens now, the language can allow for it. Do you think if someone from the OC has little mistake (they happen) he's going to be around for long?

Pilots involved in the drive will still have the same protection under the law after the drive as they do during it. Management wouldn't be stupid enough to terminate someone that was involved in the drive unless they have copious amounts of documentation to back it up. The law requires progressive discipline, so they'll need a history of discipline issues with the pilot unless he does something really egregious. The only places that management can really get away with terminating employees involved in organizing activities are companies like Wal-Mart where the employee doesn't care enough to fight it.
 
Pilots involved in the drive will still have the same protection under the law after the drive as they do during it. Management wouldn't be stupid enough to terminate someone that was involved in the drive unless they have copious amounts of documentation to back it up. The law requires progressive discipline, so they'll need a history of discipline issues with the pilot unless he does something really egregious. The only places that management can really get away with terminating employees involved in organizing activities are companies like Wal-Mart where the employee doesn't care enough to fight it.

It will be exactly that, swift, constant, progressive discipline. Check in one minute late, written warning. "Somebody?" reported that they saw you taxiing too fast, 2 week suspension. A flight attendant (management mole) said you made her feel "un-comfortable", hello home depot.
 
Who cares...

ALPA is a complete waste of money, just ask the Mesaba, Comair, ASA pilots.
 
You're right they will not terminate anybody during the drive, I don't care what you do, you could take a leak on the CP's desk and still be OK. But if the drive is ratified, then watch out. The CPM is in effect until a new contract is made and even though it rarely happens now, the language can allow for it. Do you think if someone from the OC has little mistake (they happen) he's going to be around for long?

Hey, c'mon, the SkyWest pilots have nothing to worry about. OO management loves their quality relationship with their pilots. They are far to benevolent and caring to even require a union. This has been your justification for no union correct?

It sounds like you now think management is not so nice. Perhaps you would enjoy some form of union protection from the thugs in SGU. If you were originally Anti-ALPA out of fear, well, this is a sad, yet ringing endorsement for a union. You shouldn't have to cower in fear of your management.

You can't have it both ways. Does the leadership team in SGU practice fair, open relation with pilots, or do they lead by fear-mongering?
 
It will be exactly that, swift, constant, progressive discipline. Check in one minute late, written warning. "Somebody?" reported that they saw you taxiing too fast, 2 week suspension. A flight attendant (management mole) said you made her feel "un-comfortable", hello home depot.

Again, the NMB will recognize this for what it is. The NMB may not be exactly friendly to labor under this administration, but they aren't blind either. Management would not be allowed to get away with this. You are spreading fear.

Besides, if your management team is so great, why would they ever do anything like this? We keep hearing that you don't need a union because management is so nice to you. If that's the case, then they wouldn't engage in such anti-labor tactics, right? You can't have it both ways. Either management is composed of good, honest people or not.
 
Again, the NMB will recognize this for what it is. The NMB may not be exactly friendly to labor under this administration, but they aren't blind either. Management would not be allowed to get away with this. You are spreading fear.

Besides, if your management team is so great, why would they ever do anything like this? We keep hearing that you don't need a union because management is so nice to you. If that's the case, then they wouldn't engage in such anti-labor tactics, right? You can't have it both ways. Either management is composed of good, honest people or not.

Management is not stupid, and they can find ways for this to happen. I am not spreading fear, I am offering reality. It will take years, probably 4-5, to put together a contract that is going to offer all this "bullet proof" protection, alot can happen in that time. As you can see I don't want ALPA, I don't think we need it. But what what scares me to the bone is what this place will be like in the interim.

We do have good management and for the most part things do improve and progress is made. But this vote is a slap in their face and if it goes through, it will totally disolve the trust and cohesiveness that has been developed. Not to mention that if it does go through it will be by what I can see a slim margin, that in it's self is going to polarize from within our pilot group.

It a new day and age for Airlines/Management/Business as a whole, and it's been a very long time since a relatively large pilot group has voted in a union. I think management will have but no choice to wisely protect itself during the transfer and have nothing but the best in the way of outside advisers. From what I've seen developed from ALPA, I don't think they could find their own ass with both hands and a map.
 
I started this thread to be a healthy discussion about ALPA and not a Skywest pissing contest. Let them figure that out for themselves. We are here to talk about ALPA. Again, I should have named the thread differently but I cant change it now.
Thanks
 
ALPA is a complete waste of money, just ask the Mesaba, Comair, ASA pilots.

I'm a Comair pilot. Alpa medical was worth my 2% a couple months ago when I needed it. The Loss Of License insurance is fairly cheap(nice ot know that i have a backup), and it kept management from imposing its will on me.

They aren't the reason that management wants paycuts!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom