ETOPS requirement
From experience-when we fly our 737-800 to HNL from OAK with a full load (18,000 kilos) we can only have an averge 50KT headwind,otherwise we will drop south and fly out of LAX. The real problem comes from the ETOPS fuel required for the flight. You have to have enough fuel to drop to 10,000 feet with both engines and gind away, or to loose and engine at altitude and decend at .78/320kts to 10000. Then you have to grind away at 10000 feet from the ETP to your ETOPS alternate. With a full load the fuel required with one engine for obvious reasons is very high. In the CEPAC you are allowed with approval from the FAA, to not have to use anti-ice which saves about 2000 kilos of required fuel.
We have also had problems with the seals leaking on the hydraulic actuators-Boeing has provided replacements with the new seals. They also came out with an AD to mod the pressure vent for the hydraulic system. On long flights it was freezing up and resulting in loosing positive pressure on the hydraulic resevoir which was cavitating the hydraulic pumps causing total hydraulic failure. Once the pressure vent mod is completed the problem goes away.
If you do not have the ETOPS required fuel the only way to solve the problem is to reduce payload. The 700 has 500 miles more range than the 800 but remember we are not dealing with a range problem but a contingency burn problem. When we arrive in HNL we have over 6000kilos of fuel, this means that we are carrying 3500 kilos of fuel for ETOPS safety reasons. I am sure that the 700 has to carry the same exact fuel that we do hence its payload capacity on a given day has to be reduced unless the conditions are perfect.