Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you asking me or joking?When running low on fuel how about shutting down an engine to conserve fuel?
It makes just about as much sense as shutting down an engine inflight for an unsafe gear when the QRH doesn't say to do so.Are you asking me or joking?
One again someone takes one of my posts out of context. The engine shutdown should occur over the runway, landing assured, and in the flare. The shutdown should include both engines. This is standard aeronautical knowledge for a "crash" landing. Please remember that this crew knew of the landing gear problem.It makes just about as much sense as shutting down an engine inflight for an unsafe gear when the QRH doesn't say to do so.
Which one of these would you hang for?
1. Unsafe gear- Follow QRH (lets say it says to shutdown after landing) gear collapses, prop breaks and kills one passenger. QRH followed to the letter.
2. Unsafe gear- Follow QRH but decided to shut down engine prior to touchdown. Sudden loss of lift causes hard landing, gear collapses, prop breaks and kills one passenger.
After an emergency like that every detail of that flight will be scrutinized. Ad libing to the QRH is gonna put the blame on you.
I realize the QRH doesn't talk about basic airmanship, but it does tell you when to shut down an engine. Shutting down an engine inflight is an Abnormal procedure, but don't kid yourself a dead stick landing is an emergency weather it's at 30,000 ft or 3ft.
Good on ya'!Follow the QRH... the 1900 says to shut it down prior to ground impact. It depends on the gear problem. If nothing comes down then yeah 3 feet prior to landing u shut it down. i rather hit the ground a little harder ( i doubt it thou) then with a prop spinning at 1700 rpm hitting the ground breaking off.
To answer yours question: Shutting down an engine inflight to conserve fuel is unacceptable.