ACL65PILOT
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2006
- Posts
- 4,621
From a Wall Street analysis:
M&A: Often rumored but unlikely in near term
ALK is a theoretically attractive acquisition candidate for AMR, LUV, and DAL because of the network footprint, but we believe the likelihood of a takeout is low because of acquisition cost, an uncertain industry outlook, and ALK's current revenue structure. Of the potential acquirers, DAL likely has little near-term interest as the company is digesting its October 2008 acquisition of Northwest, AMR has other cash management priorities, and LUV has set forth stringent criteria for the carrier to pursue an acquisition.
ALK derives a meaningful portion of its revenues from codeshare and interlining agreements with oneworld and SkyTeam – an acquisition would likely result in the termination of at least one of these agreements and de-value the franchise, in our view. We believe ALK would likely fight off any takeover attempt quite vigorously should the scenario present itself.
A few points:
1) When AS signed their code share agreement with Skyteam, the agreement capped any additional feed (added) to Oneworld. Eeeergo, if JAL adds a flight to PDX, AS cannot feed it. AMR ads a flight to SEA from DFW, AS cannot feed it. It is capped.
What that means is that going forward Skyteam is where AS's growth will be. It was done that way for a reason. DAL realize the importance in AS's business plan at its current state to code share with Oneworld and AMR. They allowed it to continue.
Going forward, either AS will opted to stay status quo, which may be very attractive to DAL, a company that truly does not have the cash to buy AS. A simple upping of the poison pill to a billion dollars would shore up DAL's feed to its international birds, stifle anyone who really wants AS, and allows AS to do what they really want, which is to remain an independent airline. Or of course the alternative is for the board to start a bidding war on AS and their routes.