Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

The long, dark walk on the airline conveyer belt

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
If we had less candidates, they would require higher qualified pilots to fill the seats. But what if we had less positions to fill? In the 70's, military pilots were the ones who were getting most of the jobs, and it wasn't because there was a shortage of positions. They were more qualified than your general 600 tt 100 multi pilot.

Today it's different. I'm not a military pilot, but I view that flying in the military there's not as much incentive to leave before retirement and switch to flying a 50 seat jet for 20k and then get furloughed in 2 months.
 
FlyingMan the mil pilots are not taking the 20K entrry level jobs, most are going to FedEx, SWA, Jet Blue, Air Tran, etc. They have the experienice to get into the food chain at a higher level.
 
pilotyip said:
FlyingMan the mil pilots are not taking the 20K entrry level jobs, most are going to FedEx, SWA, Jet Blue, Air Tran, etc. They have the experienice to get into the food chain at a higher level.

The reason military pilots aren't taking the "20k entry level jobs" is not because its entry level, but because it only pays 20K. If these young pilots would stop working for substandard wages, then the regionals woudn't be a "20K a year job."
I'd go to work at a regional in a heartbeat if they paid their pilots what they're worth.
 
Alpa should look at what a real union does - look at the IBEW! They are business oriented, and are divided into "locals" by location. They decide on a rate with each "contractors association" and that's that! The employers pay into a pension / welfare fund administered by each individual local, based on how many hours a person works for that contractor, in each local.
While it may take some creative thinking on the part of ALPA to reach this point, it would provide a degree of security for Pilots and would also prevent underfunding of pensions, etc.....
One major benefit - you wouldn't get fellow ALPA companies like MESA threatening your job!!!!!!!!
Just a thought.
 
Yes Rossa and there are tons of non-union electrical workers who make a decent living outside of the union structure. The same would apply to the airlines if the pilots had locals.
 
Midnight Flyer said:
Just look back to the old days when the airlines were new. The majority of the airline pilots getting hired were the ex military pilots with tons of experience. Thanks to pilot mills like Embry Riddle pumping out their riddlin kids, now there is a surplus of no experience airline applicants. This lowers the bar for everybody. It's all about supply and demand. The more future airline pilots being pumped out by these schools, the lower the airlines are willing to pay, because they know that there is always another applicant willing to work for $1000 per month. Now if supply ever dwindles down, management will be forced to raise pay and improve working conditions in order to attract pilot applicants.

When were the old days?

In the old days... let's say the 1930's when civilian Airline Pilots were flying the mail, they didn't have exclusive PIC authority and they were getting fired. The Air Mail pilots stuck together and when the next pilot was fired they all quit. Today, we are a bunch of whiney prep school boys to these men. A pilot today will refuse an aircraft only to have his fellow pilot fly it.

Well, the gov't controlled the mail, so they called in the Air Corp pilots to fly it. These military pilots were day VFR types and they were killing themselves too fast. The US Gov't finnaly relented and brought the real air mail pilots back.

Or maybe you are refering to the good ol days of WWII when the Air Lines basically mobilized the US military Air Transportation system. Without the US Air Lines the war would lasted longer. Pilots waived their union contracts and flew hours beyond. Some of the flying the Air Line Pilots did would make a Navy or Air Corp pilot gush and blush...

If you are looking for History and Pride you aren't going to find it on flightinfo.

Without History and Pride we are never going to be to help ourselves make this profession what we want and need it to be....

If we don't help ourselves then someone else will do it for us....
 
Last edited:
Supply and Demand!

Many of you have already said. It is basis economics...supply and demand. Just look at gas prices (low supply / high demand = high prices). Thats it!!!!

The only way to increase wages is to either increase demand or decrease supply. The FAA needs put higher time requirements for airlines (like 135 requirements). That would be the first step. Then maybe consider limiting the number of ATP ratings issued each year or increasing the requirements for ATP (Captains).

Right now, the airlines will never have a low supply! If the hiring pool starts to dry...no problem...just lower mins. We see it all the time...ASA just lowered hiring mins to 600TT, etc.

hell, they can lower them all the way down to no time requirements...just get your ratings - which would equal 3 months / 250 hours of flying...you find these guys all day long.
Supply and Demand...Supply and Demand...Supply and Demand!
 
100LL... Again! said:
As pilots we ave no group like doctors or lawyers do to ensure that low-time newbies can't just slide right in.

Six months and 100K can just about turn anyone into a pilot.

I've often thought the same thing. Doctors do a much better job of keeping the bar high than attorneys, but even attorneys do a much better job than we, as pilots, do in making their profession more selective.

Part of the reason that doctors have such secure, high-paying jobs is because the American Medical Association sets standards that require not just a college degree, but completion of graduate school and certfication tests to boot. The American Bar Association does the same thing. But, in this profession, it's totally true that "six months and 100K can just about turn anyone into a pilot," as 100LL said. I think professional pilots missed the boat on this a long time ago.

I know that plenty of you will disagree with me and I'll draw some fire for this. But in the long run, if we want to be treated like professionals, viewed by the public as a professionals, and compensated like a professionals, we need to set some minimal professional standards other than a high school diploma and some flight training. That seems self-evident. And I'm not talking about PTS standards.

Most people don't consider a job that only requires a high school degree + six months of training a "professional" job. That's more like vocational work, and sadly, that seems to be where this profession is headed.
 
Lebowski said:
I've often thought the same thing. Doctors do a much better job of keeping the bar high than attorneys, but even attorneys do a much better job than we, as pilots, do in making their profession more selective.

Part of the reason that doctors have such secure, high-paying jobs is because the American Medical Association sets standards that require not just a college degree, but completion of graduate school and certfication tests to boot. The American Bar Association does the same thing. But, in this profession, it's totally true that "six months and 100K can just about turn anyone into a pilot," as 100LL said. I think professional pilots missed the boat on this a long time ago.

I know that plenty of you will disagree with me and I'll draw some fire for this. But in the long run, if we want to be treated like professionals, viewed by the public as a professionals, and compensated like a professionals, we need to set some minimal professional standards other than a high school diploma and some flight training. That seems self-evident. And I'm not talking about PTS standards.

Most people don't consider a job that only requires a high school degree + six months of training a "professional" job. That's more like vocational work, and sadly, that seems to be where this profession is headed.

Oh jeez. :eek:

Now you went and done it. Pilotyip will be along shortly to give us his spiel on how being a pilot has nothing to do with being educated.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top