Here at ACA it looks like our "concessionary/LCC agreement" will be passed later today. It lowers the pay of turbo-prop and RJ guys by 3% while giving raises to those senior pilots who will possibily be flying the narrow-body aircraft. The narrow-body aircraft pilots will get the standard LCC pay without the benefits (days off, retirement, etc.) of other LCC's.
Here is the catch. A few months ago when Mesa signed their new contract in an effort to continue to grow, ACA pilots were really pissed. Most of them despise Mesa, and thought Mesa pilots were lowering the bar of the RJ industry, which to some extent they did, if you look at the concessionary agreements and TAs that have taken place since Mesa signed their contract.
Mesa's motive seemed to be this is the best we are going to get and it is better to grow and get out of here than fight for more.
At the time, I was pissed at Mesa too, but now is seems my bretherin are doing the exact same thing at ACA. The main point of this TA is growth, "hey, you RJ guys, take it up the butt so we can grow".
But, why aren't ACA pilots critical of this? The tables turn quickly when your job is in jeopardy.
ACA = MESA ??? possibly ??? or worse ???
At least Mesa made gains in their contract while getting little help from ALPA National. Meanwhile, ACA pilots who are critical of MESA, are voluntarily lowering their pay, and in the meantime possibly bringing down the LCC industry and contracts.
What ACA pilots do is up to us collectively. I'm not here to debate, and if we think concessions are necessary, then we should take them. However, the next time an ACA pilot complains about a Mesa whore they should take a look in the mirror.
Here is the catch. A few months ago when Mesa signed their new contract in an effort to continue to grow, ACA pilots were really pissed. Most of them despise Mesa, and thought Mesa pilots were lowering the bar of the RJ industry, which to some extent they did, if you look at the concessionary agreements and TAs that have taken place since Mesa signed their contract.
Mesa's motive seemed to be this is the best we are going to get and it is better to grow and get out of here than fight for more.
At the time, I was pissed at Mesa too, but now is seems my bretherin are doing the exact same thing at ACA. The main point of this TA is growth, "hey, you RJ guys, take it up the butt so we can grow".
But, why aren't ACA pilots critical of this? The tables turn quickly when your job is in jeopardy.
ACA = MESA ??? possibly ??? or worse ???
At least Mesa made gains in their contract while getting little help from ALPA National. Meanwhile, ACA pilots who are critical of MESA, are voluntarily lowering their pay, and in the meantime possibly bringing down the LCC industry and contracts.
What ACA pilots do is up to us collectively. I'm not here to debate, and if we think concessions are necessary, then we should take them. However, the next time an ACA pilot complains about a Mesa whore they should take a look in the mirror.