Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Thank You Mesaba MEC

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
TinGoose1 said:
Not to split hairs, but I heard the MKE airframe was a total hull loss. With all of the stuff 9E has done lately, I wouldn't throw any stones.....especially down the hall. Even if you ignore the cases that didn't bend metal, 9E still has a bad track record.....and safety is what counts. I'm not pocking anyone in the eye, I'm just pointing out the facts. If you question anything that I've said, ask your next FAA observer how many violations 9E experiences in comparison to the industry.....it's sobering. So the bottom line is, 138 planes vs. whatever doesn't matter one bit.

Sounds like your splitting hairs to me. Go have a beer dude.

Rook
 
Success...

FCNelson said:
So, when Mesaba's last CRJ is delivered, the score will be:

Pinnacle 139
Mesaba 15

He might be a worthless, piece-o-crap flamebaiter but it worked, didn't it? Look at all you guys. Fell for his bait, hook-line-and-sinker. Next time, let the idiot sit in the corner, talking to himself.

PS - FCNelson: Better to be silent and thought of as an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

Cya,
CP
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom