Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Terrorist Bombing of Freight Planes?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
1. The public doesn't care about cargo planes . . . unless they crash on top of them.
2. Certainly plausible that an attack could be made on the US's airfreight system, but it would be primarily an economic attack. If a few aircraft were lost, pilots would likely refuse to fly until screening was done, thus shutting down large chunks of the system. Business' in the US now rely on a lot of just-in-time shipping and small package delivery. Significantly slowing down airfreight would have a big affect on the economy.
3. Terrorists want to exact the largest headlines and instill the most fear . . that means going after innocent people instead of boxes.

This is a war. Despite all the bleating from so-called moslem moderates that it's not about Islam and not supported by the masses, one only needs look at the Islamic street. Angry, violent, volitile, mid-evil bigots are calling the tunes and intimidating any other moslems considered less than zealous. If anyone thinks that the true-believers in Iran wouldn't use a nuclear weapon as a first strike weapon, you need to get off the qualudes.
 
Last edited:
mtrv said:
Since so much of the present day terrorism is based on the promise of a rich afterlife complete with 72 virgins; wouldn't the "brainwashed" terrorist need to be aboard to fulfill the requirment?



I actually think in hell they'll be instead sleeping with one 72 yr old virgin!!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top