Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Tell me what you think about this...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I've always wondered why the hole wasn't larger, but I'm not even close to accepting that the official story is incorrect.

Now, if someone finds the wreckage of a bare aluminum 757 somewhere in the woods west of DC, then I'll start to wonder.

As far as the eyewitness accounts of a missle, not one of those eyewitnesses has ever experienced a 757 moving at 500kts right at ground level. I'll dare say that a 757 at 50ft and 500kts is a missle. In other words, their accounts don't mean much because they don't have a baseline to match their experiences up to.

Did Michael Moore produce this?
enigma
 
Another conspiracy theory?

enigma said:
Did Michael Moore produce this?
enigma
Classic! LOL By the way, this was already posted under MAJORS.
 
oh im sorry for the repost...

i just thought it would grab our attention. i have also come to the same conclusion about michale moore producing this...

but kinda sad that this kind of stuff is spreading around...
 
Seen it, and all the variations on it, and I think they're all pure BS.

http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Aircraft/el-al.htm

The above link will take you to a description of an accident in which an El Al freighter crashed into an apartment building in Amsterdam. The actual impact area is relatively small, as you can see in the photos- and that was a 747. I have no problem with the idea that a 757's impact area was relatively small. Consider variables such as the angle of impact and fuel remaining in the tanks- and the fact that there was a lot of building trying to stop American 77.

Then again, there is no reasoning with the truly paranoid...
 
That hole was about the right size for the fueselage(sp?) of a '57 anyway. Compared to a multi-store gianormous freaking building it should appear minimal. This cr@p is just made to skew the opinions of the feeble minded...
 
The Sheraton employess watched the film over and over before the FBI confiscated it. Interestingly not one was interviewed for this load of bs.
 
Remember Swiss Air 111?

Anyone see that documentary about the Swiss Air crash investigation?

Short re-cap: MD11, smoke in the cockpit, over the North Atlantic at night, dumping fuel, crashed in the ocean, total loss.

Investigators locate the wreckage and *literally* vacuum the sea floor picking up parts and pieces. None of them bigger than a notebook.

That airplane was shredded to bits and it impacted water.

Force = Mass x Acceleration.
 
I was watching something on the WTC recovery and cleanup and they said they didn't pull anything out of buildings that appeared to a part of any telephone. I think the same held true for computers. Imagine how many of those were in those buildings.........
 
First question I would ask the witnesses is when and where have you heard a missle fly over your head. I bet that not one person there could say that they have heard a missle. As for the sound, if you listen to the sound of the planes that hit the trade centers, you will notice that the engines are firewalled. That would explain the loud whoosh noise as the airplane went overhead.

These airliners were flown at such a high speed so the military won't have enough time to intercept them and shoot them down. When an ailiner hits the ground while traveling at over 400 MPH, there tends to be nothing left of the aircraft because it desentigrates. The poeple inside the airliner desintigrate as well. If you study the video of one of the planes that struck the towers, you will see that the cockpit actually comes through the other side of the building intact, and then turns into dust almost immediately. I have studied the tapes and this is what I see.

In the linked video, it shows that an aircraft that crashes leaves debris. Not one of those crashes shown were of airliners that hit the ground at over 400 MPh. All that would have been left at the pentagon and trade centers would have been small pieces and engines. The engines would have made it deep into the pentagon.
 
On another note, could you imagine the look on the face of workers who were looking out of the world trade center windows enjoying the crystal clear day. Suddenly, thier eyes catch a glimps of something ,moving fast and low and realize that it's a plane and it's coming right at them. For the sensitive people who would call me a jerk and say what did you take pleasure in the fact that people died. No I don't but I do remember that day, the sever clear day, and had I had been there, I probably would have been looking out the window. The above post is not meant to be funny what so ever. I think I spelled it out enough for even flaming retards to understand.
 
See my post under the LAX near miss thread about the validity of most "eyewitness" accounts, and how much credibility they hold with the investigative agengies.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom