You elected to make the statement. If you didn't want a reply, particuarly one quoting your own words, then don't make the statement in the first place.
You find that basic aerodynamics are only for the advanced ATP...who usually doesn't seem to know the material either, then?
It's no wonder that students aren't getting taught enough today, if the attitude is that some of these things are just too advanced for them. Best yet, why teach even the basics...dumb it all down. No more terms like "elevators," or "ailerons." We'll just call them the flippy up and downy things on the ends of the wings. The explaination of lift can be replaced with PFM, and when we discuss ground effect, let's just say "you don't need to know that. It's enough to know that it just is."
Or would that be ATP 202?
You find that basic aerodynamics are only for the advanced ATP...who usually doesn't seem to know the material either, then?
It's no wonder that students aren't getting taught enough today, if the attitude is that some of these things are just too advanced for them. Best yet, why teach even the basics...dumb it all down. No more terms like "elevators," or "ailerons." We'll just call them the flippy up and downy things on the ends of the wings. The explaination of lift can be replaced with PFM, and when we discuss ground effect, let's just say "you don't need to know that. It's enough to know that it just is."
Or would that be ATP 202?