No, Key bank is loaning the students money.
Of course they expect the students to pay back the money. They loaned the money to the students, the students are expected to pay it back.
Why exactly woud they go after TAB? They didn't loan the money to TAB, they loaned the money to the students.
Why does this seem to be such a difficult concept for some?
Look, I have no love for banks, Key or otherwise, and I'm certainly not trying to defend TAB, but there seems to be a pretty fundamental lack of understanding about what exactly occurs when you take a loan from a bank.
When you get a loan from a bank, for whatever reason, (tuition, new car, house, stereo system, whatever) you are agreeing to pay the bank back. the fact that you may have forked over all your cash to a business which took the money and ran, does not change that. You owe the bank the money. If TAB (or airman, or ATA or whoever) took your money and folded, that is between you and TAB. Now, this probably sounds harsh, but I certainly wouldn't hand over $50K in cash with no security to a company without knowing the company pretty well. And that's exactly what these students have done, handed over unsecured cash, $115K of it in one case, apparently.
The fact that the money went directly from the bank to the school doesn't change that. Legally, that's what happened, you borrowed a bunch of money, and handed it over in cash to the school. Doesn't sound too bright when you put it like that, does it?
I'm not without sympathy for the students who got screwed, but I have to shake my head when folks say they shouldn't have to pay back a loan when the company they handed that money over to went out of business.