Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWAPA "AIP reached with Company"

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
IF they code share, it won't be you doing the flying.


Flop

The language is written very sloppy , the company could do as they please . SWAPA has not done very well in the grievance department We loose just about every time .


Also not sure what your point is, you sound like the company,telling us it's flying we will never do . I am surprised that anyone at a Legacy carrier would make the comment you just made .
 
Last edited:
Flop

The language is written very sloppy , the company could do as they please . SWAPA has not done very well in the grievance department We loose just about every time .


Also not sure what your point is, you sound like the company,telling us it's flying we will never do . I am surprised that anyone at a Legacy carrier would make the comment you just made .

They're not about to let that kid beat the sh!t out of New Mexico for you. SWA makes a lot of money doing that because yours is the opposite his product. You're in a difficult spot with your new international flying. Every new, exotic destination SWA wants has 1 or 2 airlines that want to come the other way. They have great cabin service, airbuses, and are cheaper than you. If you don't affiliate with a few in some way, then you're in everyone's crosshairs. Things SWA has relied on, like not building large enough terminals, cant hold them off forever.

I'd say what you're looking at certainly needs to be voted down. GK is not smart enough to know what to ask for on scope. You guys are. Write it for him and take a lot more than you give. Dont end up with some weird, hoky AerLingusy type thing that's failed. Do you have an alliance oversight committee? Or equivalent? Call ALPA and borrow one. Steer GK into a great deal (for you) with the very best airline the furthest South you can.
 
Last edited:
Now everyone is biting on the "transborder flying" thinking that there is no way anyone is going to fly into good ole USA with a Southwest sold ticket unless it is by a southwest pilot. This contract opens the door on the next merger/ acquisition that honors ALL of their code share agreements. Remember Air Wisconsin and the huge uproar? The sheeple pilots are allowing the boot licking know it alls make every excuse and apology for the company while throwing the pilots under the bus. One Captain has a son that flies for SWA and he is willing to tank his son's future and leave him in perpetual FO land. The control of the message is working and pilots are already planning on how to spend the pitiful bone us. Their shiny charts and graphs depicting the money you will make at the historical figure of 108 TFP is a joke with the concessions they are making.
 
Finally the president put out a letter and a pitiful one it is. Total disregard for what the elected representatives expected. More trivial salesmanship. Obviously he's trying to move into the general office. Disgusting!
 
Finally the president put out a letter and a pitiful one it is. Total disregard for what the elected representatives expected. More trivial salesmanship. Obviously he's trying to move into the general office. Disgusting!

Yeah somebody(gk) bought that dude. He's no better than a Honolulu hooker.
 
They're not about to let that kid beat the sh!t out of New Mexico for you. SWA makes a lot of money doing that because yours is the opposite his product. You're in a difficult spot with your new international flying. Every new, exotic destination SWA wants has 1 or 2 airlines that want to come the other way. They have great cabin service, airbuses, and are cheaper than you. If you don't affiliate with a few in some way, then you're in everyone's crosshairs. Things SWA has relied on, like not building large enough terminals, cant hold them off forever.

I'd say what you're looking at certainly needs to be voted down. GK is not smart enough to know what to ask for on scope. You guys are. Write it for him and take a lot more than you give. Dont end up with some weird, hoky AerLingusy type thing that's failed. Do you have an alliance oversight committee? Or equivalent? Call ALPA and borrow one. Steer GK into a great deal (for you) with the very best airline the furthest South you can.

So you are talking like the company does . You think there is good codeshare and bad codeshare .

I think you just made the Christmas card list of every airline CEO
 

Latest resources

Back
Top