Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA Beats the Street

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

herc17

Active member
Joined
Feb 5, 2002
Posts
41
.08 vs est of .05 cents per share. 36th straight year of profitability Pretty sweet considering this economy.
 
Southwest Airlines reports 4Q loss
Thursday January 22, 8:13 am ET Southwest Airlines reports fourth-quarter loss on higher fuel spending

DALLAS (AP) -- Southwest Airlines says it lost money in the fourth quarter as its fuel-hedging strategy lost punch.
It was Southwest's second losing quarter of 2008 after 16 straight years without finishing a three-month period in the red. Southwest said Thursday it lost $56 million, or 8 cents per share, compared with a gain of $111 million, or 15 cents per share, a year ago. Excluding charges and other items, it earned 8 cents per share.
 
Operating income for fourth quarter 2008 was $70 million, a decrease of 44.4 percent as compared to $126 million in fourth quarter 2007.

Plus we didn't take the bath I expected on the hedges.

Gup
 
Loss of .08 is due to hedges. Operating profit of .08

Hedges are a one time charge and should not dramatically effect operating profits in 2009. Also stock is up 10 percent in pre-market trading suggesting wall street is happy (if you trust wall street). CEO on CNBC at 0730 EST also said cash balance is strong and bookings look good so far in 1st quarter.
 
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Southwest Airlines (NYSE:LUV - News) on Thursday reported a quarterly net loss due to one-time charges related to its fuel-hedging program, and said it was seeing softness in bookings for this year as the recession eats away at demand for flights.

Just shows we can not trust Wall Street, or some CEO's
 
Last edited:
They have unhedged themselves at an extremely high cost and taken a hit on balance sheet. Selling assets to raise cash and save credit rating. A new challenge and window of vulnerability for SWA. Have alot of firm orders also coming up. SHouldn't have to take any more hits for the hedges going forward. Low oil should keep them O.K.
At September 30 the company noted it had $2.4 billion in cash equivalents and $2.5 billion in Fair Value of fuel derivatives, already a big drop from the $4.7 billion in cash and $4.3 billion in derivatives 2 months prior (WTI was at $100 on Sept. 30). Also the company decided to access $400 million of the $600 million available under its revolver in October, so the net cash balance would have been roughly $3.0 billion around that time, excluding the FV of fuel derivatives.
On a December 23 update the cash balance had dropped to $1.3 billion, net of $250 million in cash collateral calls, a huge drop from 2 months prior. One could say the FMV at this point is negative: over $4 billion in "value" lost from June 30, and $3.5 billion in cash equivalents burned in less than six months for a company which is otherwise supposed to be free cash flow positive!
On the same update, the company announces it has essentially offset/sold its derivatives and only hedges 10% of its 2009-2013 fuel costs.

[URL="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_FM71j6-VkNE/SXOQf8Sg-lI/AAAAAAAAARE/G1Gn2gdgWL8/s400/LUVhedges.jpg"]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_FM71j6-VkN.../LUVhedges.jpg[/URL]Allegedly, the "modification of the hedge portfolio has significantly reduced the Company's current exposure to cash collateral requirements."
Nonetheless, at the same time LUV is feverishly raising cash: the day before the Dec. 23 update it sells $400 million 10.5% Notes due 12/2011 which are secured by 12 737-400 aircraft; On Dec. 23 it announces it is pursuing a $350 million sale-leaseback of 10 737-700 planes at an interest rate of roughly 9%, the leaseback is completed on Jan 8. Also curiously, an amendment (8.01.b) to its fuel hedge agreement on Dec. 23 stipulates that until January 2010, LUV has to continue to post cash collateral if "the obligation is below $300 million or over $700", but if it is inbetween the company has agreed to "pledge 20 737-700s in lieu of cash"... quite odd, yet we wouldn't be surprised if this is exactly what happens.
If the company's claim that its hedges are truly no longer a drain of cash, then its cash balance on the January 22 earnings call should be about $2 billion ($1.3 billion + $750 million new proceeds), all else equal.
Furthermore, the company has a cash collateral rating trigger: if its credit rating (Baa1/BBB+ currently) drops below investment grade, it would have to post cash collateral with many more counterparties. This would imply a three notch downgrade. While S&P, in a recent omnibus report claims it is not likely to downgrade LUV soon, a significant downside surprise on January 22, or additional debt-capital raises could easily change analyst Betsy Snyder's opinion.
The continuing contango steepening is indicative that someone keeps on unwinding costless collars: is it JetBlue, Delta, or is Southwest continuing to deleverage its bad future exposure all the while having to post cash collateral?
Aside from just meeting its ongoing cash needs, Southwest is faced with a cliff of future contractual obligations. Its current fleet of 520 737s (425 owned, 95 leased as of the 10-K filing) is due for modernization, with 200 aircraft approaching retirement age at 16.7 avg. years (mostly 737 -300s and -500s). Its replacement plan consists of firm contracts and options to purchase up to 246 737-700s from Boeing; assuming it scraps its options, it still is on the hook to buy 108 airplanes over the next 5 years at a cost of $3.2 billion.
And what happens if the company manages to unhedge successfully only to see a dramatic increase in the cost of crude? Goldman Sachs research currently expects LUV's 2009 fuel expense to be $2.1 billion based on 1,459 mm mainline gallons at $1.47/gallon or $62/barrel. If hypothetically oil were to go up to $90, the impact on LUV's EBIT and EBITDA, left naked without any hedges, would be -$1 billion (in other words each $1 change in oil cost is about $35MM in EBIT). And if oil is, again hypothetically, $90/barrel, there goes the company's projected $1 billion in 2009 EBIT.
 
Last edited:
Not to throw water on the flame of enthusiasm here, but an eight cent loss vs an analyst prediction of a nickle profit is not what can be termed beating the street. Congratualtions to SWA for a good year.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top