Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Stall speed

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Mojave9240

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Posts
13
I know, a very stupid question. Is there a easy way to figure out the stall speed of pistions,turboprops,jets at 5,000 on up to 40,000 feet? thanx very much!!!!!!
 
Do you mean the indicated stall speed or true stall speed? Indicated stall speed should remain the same no matter what altitude, only the true stall speed would change with altitude. But I could be wrong.

Dave
 
Convert the manual's Vs in IAS to the TAS for the Density Altitude using a whiz wheel

Why would you want TAS Vs?
 
Pinnacle found out the hard way recently, I believe, that indicated stall speed certainly does not remain the same as you climb.

~DC
 
Stall Speed

Might want to throw in some calculations for load factor, weight, aircraft configuration.
 
Both the indicated and true stall speed will increase. Its only slowflying airplane at low altitude that has a nearly constant indicated stall speed with altitude (c172 and so on). A commercial jet will have an increasing indicated stall speed due to compressibility. First of all there is an instrumet error due to compressibility which makes the airspeed indicator overread hence the indicated speed will be higher.
The second compressibility effect is the decreased coefficient of lift on the wings due to shock wave formation.

When climbing your indicated stall speed (and TAS stall speed) increases. At the same time your maximum indicated speed decreases and at a certain altitude they will be the same, ie coffin corner.

The compressibility effect on airspeed indicators can easily be corrected for but the effect of compressibility on the wings is more complex. So there is no general rule for the increase in stall speed. You would have to examine each aircraft to see what the effect will be.
 
Sbty One,

You mention slow airplane and low altitude. Are both speed and altitude factors? Whether together or apart, at what altitude and/or at what airspeed does this become a factor?
 
midlifeflyer said:
Sbty One,

You mention slow airplane and low altitude. Are both speed and altitude factors? Whether together or apart, at what altitude and/or at what airspeed does this become a factor?

As a VERY general statement, the effects are minimal below 200kts IAS and 12,000ft altitude. Your old E6-B is inaccurate for TAS computations at any altitude at higher IAS speeds. You need a Jepp "CR" type computer or something similar which does allow compressibility error to be considered. So even in King Airs and Turbo-Commanders, etc, the E-6B will be in error for TAS computations. TAS will be less than an E-6B says it is!

~DC
 
Midlifeflyer, the speed is the key factor here, however its closely linked with altitude. At low altitude you can fly 340 KIAS and still only show around mach .5. In most commercial jets you are then well below your critical mach number. but at 41000 340 KIAS would be around mach 1.2

In a jetfighter you probably have a MCRIT just below mach 1, while as a B737 maybe has a MCRIT just above mach .7 (dont quote me on that). MCRIT is defined as your free stream mach number at which you first will start to see supersonic airflow over some part of the aircraft, normally the upper sides of the wings since that is where the difference in speed of the free stream airflow and the airflow disturbed by the aircraft is the greatest.

When you get supersonic airflow over the wings a shockwave is created. It acts like a wall and either changes the laminar boundary layer to a turbulent one or simply destroys the boundary layer thereby reducing the coefficient of lift. If speed is increased in an aircraft not designed for high transonic to supersonic speeds, the boundary layer will eventually separate causing a high speed stall.

A C172 that cruises at around Mach .15 wont have any compressibility problems. But since its wing is designed for low speed flight it would get compressibility problems long before a commercial jet.
 
Stby One and DC, Thanks to both of you. Great explanations.
 
I believe the formula to calculate the new stall TAS is:

CAS of the stall speed for your desired config/weight * Square root of(density of the air at altitude/ density of air at sea level).

The stuff in the bracket is referred to as the "density ratio." You have to find the specific ratios in a table/graph, which are often published in aerodynamic textbooks, such as "Flight Theory for Pilots" or "The Advanced Pilot's Manual."

As said above, the IAS does not change.

As a reference, the formula for calculating TAS = EAS (or CAS)/ square root of density ratio. As an approximation, you can simply estimate this by increasing IAS 2% for each 1000 ft of density altitude.
 
Thanks uwochris,

I couldnt remember the exact formula but thats the one. Since the density ratio at 41000 is close to 25%, the TAS will be twice the EAS (or CAS).
 

Latest resources

Back
Top