Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Spark plug torque on Denso IK27 spark plugs

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Neal

Forums Chief Pilot
Staff member
Joined
Oct 31, 1996
Posts
839
Type aircraft owned
Carbon Cub FX-3
Base airport
KFCI
Ratings
COMM, IFR, MEL, SEL
I've been trying to find the proper torque to use on the Denso IK27 spark plugs in my Lycoming 363i from CubCrafters (essentially an IO-360). I read somewhere a year ago 15 ft-lbs and am trying to find my resource but also at the last condition inspection done as owner assisted the A&P also confirmed 15 ft-lbs. But I want to verify so if anyone knows the info please let me know.

I looked up the plug at the link below and in the specs it shows the torque values so I think 15-22 is correct. Also FYI they are 14mm plugs.

Torque SpecsCast Iron: 26-30 lb. ft. Aluminum: 15-22 lb. ft.


I do change the plugs every year, even with lean while taxiing and LOP while flying my plugs still looked like crap. For FX-3's like mine they are cheap at $10/plug. Amazon seems to be the best place to get them and I carry two spares in the plane as well.

Amazon product ASIN B000CIY4FM
 
Back to this topic on spark plug torque. CubCrafters recommends 15 ft-lbs which I think is too low. In my recent saga with Lightspeed coil packs I found that Lightspeed recommends 20 ft-lbs in their installation manual. I researched the Van's forum and seems the average is 19 ft-lbs. I have been using 18 ft-lbs.

What I also stumbled upon was discussion on using anti-seize or not. I found the Denso says NO to anti-seize as it can cause the plug to be over torqued. Interesting! I also read discussions of the same on the Van's forums. Anyone here have opinions on whether or not to use anti-seize?

 
It would be my guess that if you use anti-seize, it has a lubrication effect and hence you need to reduce the torque value to account for the lubrication. From your Google search, someone had a "-25%" adjustment factor which then makes sense if CubCrafters is recommending 15 ft-lbs and anti-seize and Lightspeed recommends 20 ft-lbs without anti-seize.
 
Interesting analysis, you may be right. What I know is when I remove my plugs to inspect or replace it takes very little force to unscrew the plug at 15 ft-lbs which concerns me imaging the force on those plugs from detonation, compression, etc. I replaced my plugs yesterday and did not use anti-seize and used 19 ft-lbs. I'm sure there is plenty of lubrication on the threads on the receiver side already.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top