Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SpaceShipOne Makes it!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I think the bottom line here is that this represents yet another remarkable achievement by Rutan in a long line of achievements that is nothing short of genius.

It's been many years, and I'm still in awe of his ability to triple the performance of a 172 with the same engine, by designing a new aircraft...what he could wring out of common materials, and the vision he sees that no one else sees until he shows it to them, leave me in awe.

To me, meeting the man is akin to meeting Charles Lindgergh or Glen Curtiss...a cornerstone of aviation history en existant.

The economic benifits of this event are not hard to fathom. At the press conference surrounding the event itself, Rutan spoke quite clearly about the profit potential and the requirements on the program to meet the needs of a tourist environment. He has always considered the economic ramifications, and a way to make the project and the development of future projects self-sustaining.

More importantly...we fly around the world all the time, but not nonstop, like the Voyager. We practice going faster, but not on less, like the Long EZ. Creation, expression, and expansion of the mind are not wasted, even when conducted for their own sake. In my opinion, if nothing else is gained by this endevor, it's greatnes comes in enlarging the limits of the human spirit, and reminding us all that what one can achieve, we can all achieve; it's a reflection of our own potential and opportunity.

After all, how many of us dreamed as kids of rocketing to space or to the moon, building estes rockets and watching flash gorden or other such programs? How many here dreamed of being an astronaut, or watched star trek and long ago decided to put childish things away and assume that truly reaching for the stars is a kids dream? I bet most of us. Rutan and the team here have reminded us that such dreams are possible, if only we combine faith with action to see them realized...just like all dreams.

As for NASA; obviously problems exist. While there is no direct correlation between a low speed suborbital re-entry proceedure in a one man pod like this, and the space shuttle system, the spaceship one event heralds new technology that will very likely serve to enhance future space shots in ways we can't yet envision. We have a glimpse of the future.

NASA has many problems, many of which have been made clearer in the public eye in recent times. Certainly new and innovative methods of launch and recovery are yet to be discovered. At the present time, re-entry vehicles returning from orbit are exposed to dangerous environmental conditions; we don't have a better way. However, I submit that we have a hint of the future yet to come, in spaceship one...we have proof that a better way can still be found, one step at the time. Redd is correct to question the present and the past; it's the only way to a better future. After all, that's exactly what Rutan and his team(s) have done.

A brilliant group of people, who have my deepest admiration.
 
Just watch and wait.

jarhead said:
To be fair, Rutan did not need to, nor did he ever approach speeds required for orbit. Once those speeds are reached in space, the energy must be bled off upon re-entry. I can't fault NASA engineers for not having designed the shuttle for a low speed re-entry.
Rutan's end goal is orbital flight. This is just a step. I, for one, can't wait to see what sort of original concepts he has for acheiving orbital flight and re-entry. This could be the start of a new "Golden Age" in space ops.

Also, Rutan has said his intial work on this project started before he knew about the X-Prize. The 10 million and the award are nice but he would have done this without it.
 
SuperFLUF said:
Also, Rutan has said his intial work on this project started before he knew about the X-Prize. The 10 million and the award are nice but he would have done this without it.

It also is a huge benefit to have a guy like Paul Allen backing this project with a very large checkbook. That's another "plus", of not having to go begging for taxpayer money. Paul Allen deserve some credit also.
 
Real Value

Think about this: for $20 million, Paul Allen could have gotten a ride on the Russian spacecraft. Or, with Rutan, he got his own complete space program! Talk about value for your money!

And, he could conceivably get some of it back via the X-Prize and commercialization of technology.

jarhead said:
It also is a huge benefit to have a guy like Paul Allen backing this project with a very large checkbook. That's another "plus", of not having to go begging for taxpayer money. Paul Allen deserve some credit also.
 
I gotta say, this is one of the most interesting and informative threads I've ever read on this board.

BUT, did anyone else think that is was just plain fuggin' cool to see an "N" number on the side of the craft as it was looking down from space?:D
 
Last edited:
According to space.com it there were some loud bangs and a wicked shimmy. Something about primary flight control system failure followed by uncommanded 90 degree right and left rolls, and failure of a fairing.
 
some_dude said:
..........And, he could conceivably get some of it back via the X-Prize and commercialization of technology............
I will be quite shocked if he doesn't get all of it back plus quite a profit from licensing the technology. Even more when Rutan makes it into orbit.
 
Avbug

Leave it to Avbug to bring light to any situation.

In some ways, Bill Melville reminds us that it is not always the low bidder but the higher vision that leads us to success. There is a passage from Isaiah 41 -- but those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like eagles, they will run and not grow weary.

The hope to do more, the hope to search more, the hope to dream bigger and bigger dreams.
 
sqwkvfr said:
I gotta say, this is one of the most interesting and informative threads I've ever read on this board.

BUT, did anyone else think that is was just plain fuggin' cool to see an "N" number on the side of the craft as it was looking down from space?:D
interesting info on the registry for that n number,
engine none?
is that 'cause the faa doesn't have a classification for a rubber oxidizing rocket engine?
N328KF is Assigned​

Assigned/Registered Aircraft
Aircraft Description

Serial Number 001 Type Registration Corporation Manufacturer Name
SCALED COMPOSITES LLC
Certificate Issue Date
03/20/2003 Model
316
Status
Valid Type Aircraft
Glider
Type Engine
None Pending Number Change
None
Dealer
No Date Change Authorized
None
Mode S Code
50706357 MFR Year
2003
Fractional Owner
NO


Registered Owner

Name SCALED COMPOSITES LLC Street
1624 FLIGHTLINE HANGAR 78 City
MOJAVE State CALIFORNIA Zip Code 93501 County
KERN Country
UNITED STATES


Airworthiness


Engine Manufacturer NONE Classification Experimental Engine Model NONE Category Research and Development A/W Date 12/09/2003
 
"Please tell me you still have that lime green hatchback for sale"
 

Latest resources

Back
Top