Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest CEO: AirTran Deal 'Imperative' To Counter Fuel Spike

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Frequency

Well-known member
Joined
May 23, 2002
Posts
111
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110225-710894.html

Southwest CEO: AirTran Deal 'Imperative' To Counter Fuel Spike

PEWAUKEE, Wis. (Dow Jones)--The head of Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) said Friday it is "absolutely imperative" the company completes its planned merger with AirTran Holdings Inc. (AAI) as a hedge against soaring jet fuel costs.
Gary Kelly, chairman, president and chief executive of Dallas-based Southwest, said both carriers could be forced to shrink without a deal the companies aim to close in the second quarter of this year.
Kelly's comments came during testimony before the Senate Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights subcommittee.
The Justice Department in November made a second request for information on the planned deal that would expand Southwest's domestic capacity by more than a fifth and provide entry to key markets such as Atlanta for the first time.
The proposed deal has attracted little opposition from rivals and lawmakers compared with recent consolidation in the U.S. industry.
The field hearing was called by Sen. Herb Kohl (D., Wis.), who in his opening remarks planned to question the potential impact of the deal on competition from Milwaukee's Mitchell Airport.
Southwest and AirTran would have a combined 39% share at the airport.
"The experience of other airline mergers in recent years gives us reason for caution," said Kohl.
Of the Southwest/AirTran deal he said: "I get the feeling that there are goods and bads to it."
Kelly said the enlarged airline would provide "Milwaukee-area customers with access to an even stronger and nationwide low-fare, low-cost carrier network."
He declined to provide Sen. Kohl with a guarantee that Southwest would maintain the airlines' combined capacity at Milwaukee after the deal closes, citing the uncertainty created by fuel prices. "We want to grow...but we have to do that in a fiscally responsible way," he said. Diana Moss, vice president of the American Antitrust Institute, called AirTran a "maverick" and said there was a risk of fares rising and capacity cuts. "It is clear that AirTran is an aggressive discounter relative to Southwest," she said. "Fares could edge higher and rivalry diminish."
Kelly said Southwest was unlikely to maintain AirTran's crew base--of 70 to 90 pilots--in Milwaukee after a merger, though he expected the number of airport staff to expand as it worked to boost frequencies. He also said Southwest has yet to determine the fate of AirTran's code share deal with Skywest Airlines Inc. (SKYW). Southwest's pilots' contract precludes domestic code sharing.
 
I guess it is a merger of equals. Both need each other equally. You do have to wonder what a difference it makes now that SWA no longer has the advantage with fuel hedging like it did last time fuel spiked?
 
I guess it is a merger of equals. Both need each other equally. You do have to wonder what a difference it makes now that SWA no longer has the advantage with fuel hedging like it did last time fuel spiked?

Post of the year!
 
This press release and the similar statement made by our CEO is obviously a very calculated move to pressure the stockholders and regulators.
 
I guess it is a merger of equals. Both need each other equally. You do have to wonder what a difference it makes now that SWA no longer has the advantage with fuel hedging like it did last time fuel spiked?

Dan the man,

Actually we are hedged real nice per LW. This will also allow for AT to be placed under our umbrella. It might be a bumpy road the next year but SWA/AT will come out strong.
 
Airtran is hedged roughly the same as SWA this year, but since the merger was announced, Airtran has not grown their hedge portfolio. Only hedged 5% for 2012. Bob needs this deal to go through or else we enter next year poorly hedged.
 
Making Money during high oil prices

On July 11th 2008 Oil hit a high of 147.27 per brl

AAI closed at $1.70 a share

LUV closed at $13.20

For the year 2008 AAI Had a Net loss of $273.8 million ($2.51 per share)

For the year 2008 LUV Had a Net profit of $178 Million ($.24 per share)

I don't think there is anything Airtran or Bob Fornaro can show Gary Kelly and Southwest about making money when oil prices are high. Let's not kid ourselves people. It's obvious who needs who. Not saying AAI is bringing nothing to the party lets just try to keep some semblance of reality in your posts.

RWAV
 
On July 11th 2008 Oil hit a high of 147.27 per brl

AAI closed at $1.70 a share

LUV closed at $13.20

For the year 2008 AAI Had a Net loss of $273.8 million ($2.51 per share)

For the year 2008 LUV Had a Net profit of $178 Million ($.24 per share)

I don't think there is anything Airtran or Bob Fornaro can show Gary Kelly and Southwest about making money when oil prices are high. Let's not kid ourselves people. It's obvious who needs who. Not saying AAI is bringing nothing to the party lets just try to keep some semblance of reality in your posts.

RWAV

And give away their insistence that 17 years at AAI should be equal to 37 years at SWA??? C'mon! (said with the appropriate GOB Bluth inflection - and if you don't get that, I've made a HUGE mistake)

PapaWoody

PS And if you DO get that, then I'm buying the beer any trip that we're on together!!! :beer:
 
I'm hearing a lot of crickets over here.
 
I think it is ironic that the Airtran guys want to disregard everything their CEO has to say as being false but hang on every word Gary has to say. For what it is worth I think both CEO's are trying to make their case for a quicker transaction, which if we as pilots don't screw it up will benefit us all!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom