Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest Airilnes Crosses into the Gray

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I am not surprised many of the companies w/ current pension plans are not pushing for this more. Everyone is under-funded. By increasing the retirement age, it will reduce the amount that each account is under-funded.

For example, if the age is raised to 65. The group currently has 8,000 pilots. If the average payout per pilot is (this is an arbitrary #) $100,000 per year + medical benefits then the company could save $800,000,000 per year (8,000 pilots @ $100,000) times 5 years for a total of $4,000,000,000 plus medical benefits.

Even if current plans are frozen, as NWA pilots are considering, this would help the viability of the plans long term.
 
mjs said:
By increasing the retirement age, it will reduce the amount that each account is under-funded.

For example, if the age is raised to 65. The group currently has 8,000 pilots. If the average payout per pilot is (this is an arbitrary #) $100,000 per year + medical benefits then the company could save $800,000,000 per year (8,000 pilots @ $100,000) times 5 years for a total of $4,000,000,000 plus medical benefits.

The numbers are a little more complicated than that, because you also have longevity pay issues and training costs.

Let's say you are replacing a 15th year pay CA with a 7th yr pay CA. You are also replacing a 7th yr FO with a newhire, but you are incurring two training events, at least, but amortizing them over the number of years. Then there are the taxes, employer contributions, etc to be made on the lower amounts.

Maybe someone would like to crunch those numbers, but it looks like the $100K the reitree is getting will be subsidized in large part with the newhire's probationary year pay . . . . :mad:
 
A general rule of thumb in this business, if your company wants it, you probably DON'T!
 
Purpledog said:
A general rule of thumb in this business, if your company wants it, you probably DON'T!

Another general rule of thumb in this business is that new, inexperienced guys like you don't have a F...kn clue. Let me guess, went to college, Uncle Sam taught you to fly, had a buddy or two at Fedex, got the job, and now the world owes you. I think 25 years from now your views will be far different after you complete your education on the realities of life.
 
FoxHunter said:
Another general rule of thumb in this business is that new, inexperienced guys like you don't have a F...kn clue. Let me guess, went to college, Uncle Sam taught you to fly, had a buddy or two at Fedex, got the job, and now the world owes you. I think 25 years from now your views will be far different after you complete your education on the realities of life.

.....but purple is correct-a - mundo....if they say it's good for you then probably it's not
 
Last edited:
FoxHunter said:
Let me guess, went to college, Uncle Sam taught you to fly, had a buddy or two at Fedex, got the job, and now the world owes you. I think 25 years from now your views will be far different after you complete your education on the realities of life.


Let me guess. Too short to get a military pilot's slot. Worked for an airline that was about to go out of business. Got bought out by FedEx. Didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of getting hired here off the street. You got no buddies to recommend you for anything. And now the world owe's you a job until you're drooling all over the yoke.

BTW- you can thank ALPA for your relative seniority at FDX. If it had been up to the non-union FedEx pilots you would have been stapled to the bottom.

Have a great day!
 
nimtz said:
Can someone tell me why the Southwest pilot group wants age 60 repealed so bad that they want their union leading the charge in DC? I'm not making any judgements, but I'm just curious to hear from a line pilot the reasons why SWAPA has always lead the fight for this change?

Good Question Nimtz, as a 3 year WN FO I'll throw in my two cents.. Firstly, since nobody can seem to agree on this, maybe we should all call it exactly what it is: Greed. Everyone wants what is best for him or her, period. The older pilots want to stick around to make MORE money, and the younger guys want them out so they can.. Myself included.



Now on to your question about the "Southwest Pilot Group".. There was a vote several years ago on wheather or not to utilize the resources of SWAPA to pursue a change to the age 60 rule. I don't know what the yea/nea breakdown was at that time, but was in favor of 'yea'. If you currently had access to the SWAPA newspaper, or the SWAPA online forums, you would easily draw the conclusion that every pilot at SWA wants this rule to be changed. Part of this is because there are an intensely vocal few pilots who may not speak completely for the rest of us. I've discussed the age 60 amendment with every CA that I've flown with over the last few months, and it has been my observation (perhaps I'll start an official poll at work!) that the majority (by an overwhelming margin) of these guys want the rule to stay in place! That being said, I'm still relatively junior and thus am flying with fairly junior captains, which naturally want career advancement. My suspicion is that the outcome of a vote at this point in the game may be completely different as there has been a tremendous amount of hiring at SWA in the last few years, and there are a lot of younger folks on the property. Personally I'd like to see another vote.



I have to laugh at the age discrimination argument because there is age discrimination everywhere in this country. The right to drive, drink, fight for your country are all dictated by age. Many of the federal law enforcement agencies have mandatory retirement ages, you can't be the President until you are 35, is that discrimination? How about the fact that you can't hold an ATP until you are 23? What if I was an extremely bright and responsible 18 year old should I have the right to claim age discrimination because I can't be an airline captain?



Lastly, for every FO out there, and everyone who wants to fly at a Major airline, don't buy the "Oh, this will be good for you, you'll be a captain longer!" hook. It just isn't true; it will make you a first officer for another five years, or keep you at the regional airline/military for that much longer. As for being able to work for another 5-7 years, are you sure that you'll hold a medical that long? I'm not. I sure plan to do everything in my power to make sure I'm healthy, but I'm not willing to delay my upgrade for a "chance" of working past age 60.



Every one of us knew the rules of this game when we got into it.. This whole issue reminds me of folks who move in a neighborhood directly under the final approach path of a busy airport, then complain about the noise.

greedy huh?
 
Last edited:
GearDaddy said:

Every one of us knew the rules of this game when we got into it.. This whole issue reminds me of folks who move in a neighborhood directly under the final approach path of a busy airport, then complain about the noise.

greedy huh?


Bingo! Excellent analogy.
 
fr8doggie said:
Let me guess. Too short to get a military pilot's slot. Worked for an airline that was about to go out of business. Got bought out by FedEx. Didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of getting hired here off the street. You got no buddies to recommend you for anything. And now the world owe's you a job until you're drooling all over the yoke.

BTW- you can thank ALPA for your relative seniority at FDX. If it had been up to the non-union FedEx pilots you would have been stapled to the bottom.

Have a great day!

I actually started with Seaboard World as a DC8 F/O when I was age 21. Seaboard was bought by Tigers in 1980, and you know that Tigers was bought by Federal Express in 1989. During the period at Seaboard 1969-1978 I was on furlough for a total of over 7 years. Then I was also one of the 54 Seaboard pilots and FEs that were furloughed out of seniorty in 1981 for 6 months after the Tiger/Seaboard merger. Over those furlough periods I flew for Capitol, East African Airways, Aerovias Quisqueyana, International Air Bahama, EFS Bahamas, Rosenbalm, Sterling Philippines, Evergreen, and ONA based in Jeddah. My quess is that I have a fuller world view as a result of my experience.

Now as far as my height?:) I happen to be 5'9" so I don't think that was ever an issue. Yes, Federal Express bought Tigers, luckiest day in the life of any Tiger pilot, or the smaller number of Seaboard pilots working there.:) You are correct that I probably would never have been hired off the street. Hell, I don't even have a college degree. That really doesn't matter since I'm probably a lot senior to you and if that is the case it will never change.

The world doesn't owe me a thing. I like my job, do it very, very well, and I like working for FedEx. I don't have much time for those that sound very unhappy in their job. I would hope that does not include you, but I suspect it may. If I still like it when I turn 60 I plan to continue if the rule changes.

I can thank the contract that Tigers had plus Fred Smith and Sol Steinberg and the year of the purchase for the lack of staple. I believe the staple became common after USAIR stapled Empire and American did the same to Reno and for the most part TWA. Mergers have always been between pilot groups, funded by the indivdual groups. In the Federal Express/Tiger case ALPA made an exception and paid the Tiger expenses because in the end they wanted to represent the Federal Express pilots.

You also try to have a great day, try not to kick the dog.:(
 

Latest resources

Back
Top