Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Skywest Prospectus--says it all here.....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
They don't want a union around because they feel they need to change things more than once every four years to adapt to the industry. That wouldn't be possible with a UNION CONTRACT.

But it is possible with a union contract! It's called a side letter, or Letter of Agreement. ASA has 29 of them. You can peruse at http://www.asacontract.com/pa/loa_index.asp. LOA 27 in particular has been very beneficial to ASA pilots.

For example, when ASA got the CRJ 700, LOA 29 was negotiated. It outlays the CRJ 700 payrates. Also, all pilots got a 0.5% raise in exchange for a change of our duty in times by 15 minutes. This is the power of a union contract -- management can negotiate a change to it, but it's not a one-way street.
 
and the one that personally kills me:
Brian Retard LaBrecque......$450,629 This guy ain't worth our FO first year pay. He's making almost a half mill in a year. Dam.
Trojan

Anything in there on what King Tutt and Scotty boy make? Heard ScottyBoy got extended flying the line recently. Cool.

ASA Overpaid Management
More for them, Less for you!
 
Anything in there on what King Tutt and Scotty boy make? Heard ScottyBoy got extended flying the line recently. Cool.

ASA Overpaid Management
More for them, Less for you!
No, unfortunately not. Those were the only names posted.

Trojan
 
"Integrating the operating platforms" to achieve cost savings and merging the two airlines are two COMPLETELY different things. Don't be naive enough to confuse them.
My thoughts exactely!!! They can merge operations and business practices but they don't ever have to merge list!
That right there would be the cheapest thing to merge if you asked me. Sure there would be some arguments from both sides but the cost to the holding company would be minor.
Jerry and Co. are trying to see cost savings in reducing redundant operating positions in the GO's and operations side of things. Pilot FA and even ramp positions aren't redundant as they would still need the same number of people in those positions to operate the merged airline.
Just my thoughts........
 
My thoughts exactely!!! They can merge operations and business practices but they don't ever have to merge list!
That right there would be the cheapest thing to merge if you asked me. Sure there would be some arguments from both sides but the cost to the holding company would be minor.
Jerry and Co. are trying to see cost savings in reducing redundant operating positions in the GO's and operations side of things. Pilot FA and even ramp positions aren't redundant as they would still need the same number of people in those positions to operate the merged airline.
Just my thoughts........

With that scenario, you would still be D'HDing crews all over the States between Georgia Utah and Cincy. It's still costly. Not to mention the new hires ASA is losing to SkyWest. What's that costing? Perhaps about $20G's a pilot? I know Jerry can afford it. He had an additional $13,800 for his car lease. $5800 for his country club membership. And that's just the stuff that's published.

Trojan
 
This is also in the Skywest 10-K

Growth Opportunities
During the five years ended December 31, 2006, our total operating revenues expanded at a compounded annual rate of 41.6% and the number of daily flights we operated increased from approximately 1,000 at the end of 2002 to approximately 2,400 as of December 31, 2006. With the exception of our acquisition of ASA, our growth during that five-year period was internally generated. We believe there are additional opportunities for expansion of our operations, consisting primarily of:
· Delivery of Aircraft Under Firm Order. We have firm orders to acquire eight additional new CRJ900s. In addition, we intend to operate 11 additional CRJ200s through third-party lease arrangements and sublease 12 additional CRJ700s from Delta during the year ending December 31, 2007. Additionally, we expect to place four owned CRJ200 spare aircraft into service in 2007. We have agreements with Delta or Midwest to place all 35 of these aircraft into revenue service, under long-term, fixed-fee contracts.
· Potential Opportunities from Delta’s Restructuring. We believe that as Delta restructures its fleet under bankruptcy protection, there may be new regional flying contracts that become available for qualified regional carriers. ASA holds certain rights to maintain its proportion of overall Delta regional flights, as well as its proportion of Delta’s regional flights to and from Atlanta. This may help ASA compete for new flying mandates, if any, that come into existence at Delta.
· Scope Clause Relief. “Scope clauses” are elements of major airlines’ labor contracts with their own pilots that place restrictions on the number and size of aircraft, or the amount of flight activity, that can be operated by major airlines’ regional airline contractors such as ASA and SkyWest Airlines. Greater liberalization of scope clauses generally creates more business opportunities for regional airlines. Since 2001, five major national airlines (American Airlines, Inc. (“American”), Delta, Northwest Airlines, Inc. (“Northwest”), United and US Airways, Inc. “US Airways”) have achieved some scope clause liberalization. If further efforts by major airlines to relax scope clause restrictions are successful, it may create incremental opportunities for regional airlines.

· Narrowbody Replacement Flying. A meaningful portion of the recent growth of the regional airline industry resulted from the replacement of major airline-operated narrowbody jet aircraft (such as 737s, DC9s, MD80s and A319s) with regional airline-operated jets on the same routes. The major airline affects this change in equipment to achieve an advantage in trip costs, unit costs, frequency or a combination of these benefits. At present, the fleets of the six major national airlines include a significant number of narrowbody aircraft that are more than 15 years old. Such older aircraft are frequently less fuel- and maintenance-efficient than new aircraft. If major airlines decide to substitute newer regional airline-operated equipment for any portion of these older narrowbody aircraft under their retirement, it may create incremental opportunities for regional airlines.
Good for SKYW shareholders...bad for pilots industry-wide.
 
Skywest managment knows if they screw up pretty bad we will get a union next day. They don't want a union around because they feel they need to change things more than once every four years to adapt to the industry. That wouldn't be possible with a UNION CONTRACT.
If anybody here can tell me one thing that would currently improve at Skywest with ALPA, I will vote tomorrow.
It's only my opnion, but ALPA is only a good union when you have a good management. Talk to a FEDEX guy and with a USAir or Mesa and you will get two different views of ALPA.


I agree pretty much with this statement with the difference about ALPA only being good with good management. I think they are only good for the majors and then only with good ALPA management.

Now if ALPA were to come up with a unified position about airport security I would sign up in a second. Imagine how fast the pointless bs with the TSA would change if every ALPA carrier stopped flying because airline pilots are sick of getting finger ficked by some retard that couldn't make at Taco Bell?
 
I agree pretty much with this statement with the difference about ALPA only being good with good management. I think they are only good for the majors and then only with good ALPA management.

Now if ALPA were to come up with a unified position about airport security I would sign up in a second. Imagine how fast the pointless bs with the TSA would change if every ALPA carrier stopped flying because airline pilots are sick of getting finger ficked by some retard that couldn't make at Taco Bell?

I understand the anti-alpa rhetoric to a degree. I think most of us do. I don't blindly go by the words of ALPA or what the reps say. I do formulate my own theories and try to read between the lines. However, now think about SKYW and ASA 2600 pilots + 1600 pilots at a REGIONAL!! Unified as ONE. I do feel John Prater needs a little time to prove his worth and unf$#@ what worthless did. I have faith in Prater so far but he's new. Give him some time to work. United we stand....

Trojan
 

Latest resources

Back
Top