Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
fieldinsight said:601 and 602 are gone, especially since Compass will be flying CRJ's initially. I wouldn't be surprised if they are the first two planes over there. XJ isnt going to get any further CRJ's. 9E will be lucky to keep theirs.
NWA has to get a lot of their house in order to get the 76 seaters on the property and in service by March 07. I see a lot of CRJ flying heading over there. With all the orders ahead of them, I don't see the 175's coming that quick, regardless.
YourPilotFriend said:There is a perfectly good reason to start another airline, money. The real problem here is the person making decisions is Neal Cohen. He will serve as both the chairman of Compass and as CFO of NWA. When the stock issues, the exec's will get a huge chunk of the pie. They initially go to 36 airplanes to keep the growth low. When the stock goes public, they will transfer all flying from XJ and 9E to Compass. The airline then will experience amazing growth and the exec's will be wearing gold diapers. Since the flying will remain under in house control, it will not be sold. Don't worry the XJ'ers and 9E'ers will get a staple job, but at year 1 pay. Who will stop the bleeding?
tripacer said:Here's an idea. Let's let the NWA furloughed pilots stop the bleeding. They aren't going back to mainline. But what makes you think that a furloughed DC9 pilot should just slide into a captain position at Compass, an alter ego company, ahead of a mesaba pilot? Why not an FO position at XJ flying the Saab. Too good for that?
What this is, is another twist to scabbing. NWA pilots have justified it to themselves that they are helping furloughed NWA pilots get off the street but in reality its at the expense of another airline pilot. If NWA wants to create another airlink and it helps get those guys off the street, but not at our expense - then great. But with this scenario, you've essentially furloughed 2/3 of the XJ pilot group, taking our union jobs.
If you're an XJ pilot, then you have every right to call NWA pilots what they are if this TA goes thru - SCABS.
NWA ALPA is my problem. They are eliminating 2/3 of the XJ pilot group jobs, if this TA passes. Why am I the problem? Because I think I deserve fair and equal representation from the same union that is pounding my head against the wall? Am I suppose to feel grateful to all the redtail pilots for allowing me to have a flying job for over 6 years. Oh, that's right, my job is to protect mainline - at all costs! - Whatever.Yudso said:Truly brilliant. If you are an XJ pilot, you should be more concerned with our own problems and let NWA ALPA deal with it's problems. If the TA passes they give up rights to all that flying. It is not your place to claim that it belongs to XJ pilots. Looks like I just took the bait.
tripacer said:NWA ALPA is my problem. They are eliminating 2/3 of the XJ pilot group jobs, if this TA passes. Why am I the problem? Because I think I deserve fair and equal representation from the same union that is pounding my head against the wall? Am I suppose to feel grateful to all the redtail pilots for allowing me to have a flying job for over 6 years. Oh, that's right, my job is to protect mainline - at all costs! - Whatever.
If this TA passes, any furloughed NWA pilot that accepts a job at Compass is a SCAB! No different then you guys screaming about *************************, MidAtlantic, Mesa, Freedumb, Republic - all ALPA alter-ego carriers.
FU Woerthless.
Detroitpilot22 said:so this company is just going to fly one crj around for 8 months until they get their 76 seat aircraft
Tripacer -tripacer said:Here's an idea. Let's let the NWA furloughed pilots stop the bleeding. They aren't going back to mainline. But what makes you think that a furloughed DC9 pilot should just slide into a captain position at Compass, an alter ego company, ahead of a mesaba pilot? Why not an FO position at XJ flying the Saab. Too good for that?
What this is, is another twist to scabbing. NWA pilots have justified it to themselves that they are helping furloughed NWA pilots get off the street but in reality its at the expense of another airline pilot. If NWA wants to create another airlink and it helps get those guys off the street, but not at our expense - then great. But with this scenario, you've essentially furloughed 2/3 of the XJ pilot group, taking our union jobs.
If you're an XJ pilot, then you have every right to call NWA pilots what they are if this TA goes thru - SCABS.
I guess my beef with the mainline group at NWA is this:Schwanker said:Tripacer -
First of all, I'm a furloughed NWA pilot and am against this TA. I wish I had the opportunity to vote NO. Second of all, I will not take a position with Compass if it does eventually surface as I have a much better job right now with the military.
You are completely off the mark blaming NWA pilots for you current situation. Was Mesaba and Pinnacle SCABBING while they were hiring and flying DC-9 routes while NWA was furloughing?
Currently with the exception of the inefficient AVROs, all flying above 55 seats belongs to mainline. It has been this way for years. Why would a Mesaba pilot have a right to this flying over a NWA pilot?
Why shouldn't a furloughed pilot be able to slide into a captian position at Compass if this TA passes? That was exactly what was negotiated. Anyone else at Compass would be a newhire with the knowledge that NWA pilots have super-seniority flowback rights. If they don't like it, don't apply.
I don't like this TA any more than you. Unfortunately, Mesaba has not experienced any real growth and the AVROs are at risk. Mesaba has only been allowed to fly 55 seat aircraft and smaller with the exception of the AVROs. That's the job you interviewed for and accepted. Don't blame mainline pilots for you situation.
From what I understand, Mesaba pilots would not have allowed NWA pilots super seniority to get the 56+ seat flying. I understand your position but at the same time, you have no complaint if the flying goes somewhere else. It may be the price to pay to get the flying. The up side would have been a flow through and larger aicraft at your company. This was a choice by your pilot group and from your attitude, I'm sure you support it. That's your right. Just don't blame NWA pilots if the flying goes somewhere else.
I wish you and all Mesaba pilots the best in the future. I sure it will be challenging just as it is for mainline pilots.
Schwanker
Because compass was a compromise, and obviously it could be worse if the judge allows the CBA rejection. They were going to hurt us even worse, look at the mechanics. The mechanics probably would have hurt the company more by not striking, and every deal the company offered afterwards was way worse; now they get nothing. Yes compass hurts, this whole TA hurts, but it is the lesser of the evils.Flyerjosh said:Tell me this- why is the issue even being discussed in the light it is by NWA pilots? For some reason they feel that Compass is "their" airline and "their" flying.
It's not. If it was, then the pilots at Compass would be ON THE SAME SENIORITY LIST. IMO, all that is happening is that management at NWA has figured out a way to park the DC9's and transfer that flying to a less costly company. How is this any different that any other "alter ego" airline, regardless of who ends up with the flying?
It does nothing but hurt the pilot groups at BOTH the regional levels and NWA. Prove me otherwise.
YourPilotFriend said:Because compass was a compromise, and obviously it could be worse if the judge allows the CBA rejection. They were going to hurt us even worse, look at the mechanics. The mechanics probably would have hurt the company more by not striking, and every deal the company offered afterwards was way worse; now they get nothing. Yes compass hurts, this whole TA hurts, but it is the lesser of the evils.
whaleroast said:Enjoy your flying, you sackless POS! It wasn't a compromise, it was a rape, and you're the old lady with the diaper around your knees. It's amazing how you could rationalize such an agreement, but I suppose you have your winter gas bill to pay so that might explain your decision.
YourPilotFriend said:Because compass was a compromise, and obviously it could be worse if the judge allows the CBA rejection. They were going to hurt us even worse, look at the mechanics. The mechanics probably would have hurt the company more by not striking, and every deal the company offered afterwards was way worse; now they get nothing. Yes compass hurts, this whole TA hurts, but it is the lesser of the evils.