3
350DRIVER
Frac,FracCapt said:Ok...let's put you with a 500hr pilot with no jet time(but 20 hours of time in the sim) for your next PC and see what you think. Hmmmmm?
I understand your concern and what you are saying. I just tend to put more emphasis on that person's experience, skill level, background, track record, history, etc, versus prematurely judging that person based solely upon how much flight time that he or she may have at the time.
We both know for a fact that a type rating/sim time will do them little good if anything in the "real world" (135/91)at such a low total time since they are not "insurable" to be a SIC, so now the issue becomes whether or not they are adequately trained enough to be in that position to be a good sim partner, I tend to think that they are. Obviously you have exceptions to this and I am sure a few cases could be documented that would support your opinion but I don't think what you are saying is the norm here with regards to this issue.
If they were trained, sharp, know their stuff, evaluated by program managers, etc, then throw me in the sim with one and I bet I do just fine.
You can argue this both ways but I think it would be like saying that Pepsi is better than Coke, it comes down to personal preferences more than anything else.
I know many corporate and charter departments that would never allow this practice to take place since they are paying big bucks for the training but on the other end I know just as many of these operators that could care less...
take your pick...
3 5 0