Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

She Is Back

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Flying Illini said:
She's suing because the men who "lay across plane seats with their skirt slightly hiked up" weren't fired?

No, she's suing because the men had, at least in 2 cases, overtly sexual content on their blogs, had pictures of themselves in uniform, and were let off the hook. She had a few links on her site to these blogs. They were pretty digusting, and they didn't even get a warning. But then again, Delta did sponsor pride week or whatever it was called in ATL.:eek:
 
sleepy said:
She submitted a sex discrimination complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The EEOC elected not to sue Delta directly but issued a "right to sue letter."

When someone files a complaint with the EEOC, there is an investigation. At the conclusion of the investigation, if the EEOC finds that the case is not substantiated, they issue their findings, administratively close the case and issue a "right to sue letter." Or a complainant can ask the EEOC to cease the investigation, administratively close the case, and issue the "right to sue letter." With the amount of time that has elapsed (she filed the complaint on October 8, 2004), the first scenario is most likely. Given that the EEOC investigates and tries to get the parties to mediate to avoid lawsuits, absent a finding of discrimination by the EEOC prevailing in court is much more difficult.

HR Diva
 

Latest resources

Back
Top