Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Sharks smell the blood in the water

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

michael707767

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Posts
1,640
Southwest to Shift Flights to Philadelphia

.c The Associated Press

DALLAS (AP) - Southwest Airlines plans to cut 88 flights in October and shift planes to more profitable routes, mostly in and out of Philadelphia, officials said Monday.

The low-cost carrier said Monday it hopes the changes will increase revenue by $60 million.

``It's just taking the planes and redeploying them. The capacity remains the same,'' said Ed Stewart, a Southwest spokesman. ``We should see increased revenue by putting planes in places where lots of people want to fly.''

Stewart said the Oct. 31 schedule changes will result in 41 daily flights at Philadelphia, where Southwest began service in May. The Dallas-based carrier said Philadelphia has been its most successful opening ever.

The changes will affect about 3 percent of Southwest's schedule of 2,800 daily flights.

Southwest said it would reduce some round-trip flights between Kansas City and Chicago, Dallas and Tulsa, Houston and New Orleans, and many less-frequent routes.

For example, the company will cut daily departures at Dallas from 130 to 123 daily and reduce Kansas City flights from 70 to 61 each day. Among less-traveled routes, Southwest plans to trim Albuquerque-El Paso flights from four to three daily.

The changes were first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

Southwest has been hurt by rising costs for jet fuel and labor and saw second-quarter profits slide 54 percent.

The airline has partly insulated itself against fuel increase by buying about 80 percent of its supply under long-term deals with guaranteed lower prices, but still paid 21.5 percent more for fuel in the April-June period than it did a year earlier.

On the labor side, the company reached a deal last month that gave flight attendants average pay raises of 31 percent over six years.

Gary Kelly, who replaced James Parker as chief executive last month, said in a recent interview that Southwest was ``pushing the boundary of what we can afford with our wages.''

Southwest has said that earnings in the July-September quarter will beat last year's profit of $106 million. Kelly said bookings for July and August were strong.

Shares of Southwest were down 4 cents to $14.66 in afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

On the Net: http://www.southwest.com



08/23/04 13:32 EDT

Copyright 2003 The Associated Press.
 
"On the labor side, the company reached a deal last month that gave flight attendants average pay raises of 31 percent over six years.

Gary Kelly, who replaced James Parker as chief executive last month, said in a recent interview that Southwest was ``pushing the boundary of what we can afford with our wages.''


Hmmmmmm. I'll bet that even Southwest is starting to consider its own wage strucutre in light of wage cutbacks elsewhere and competitive fare reductions.... The domino effect in action!
 
The article may talk about the 88 flights that SWA is cutting, but it doesn't mention that SWA is still adding aircraft and with the new Oct schedule will be flying more hours even with the 88 flights gone. It is also expected that SWA will see an increase of about $60 million in revenue because of the new flights. By the end of the year it is palned tha SWA will have 193 -700s, 194 - 300s, 25 -500s, & 5 -200s, for a total 0f 417 aircraft. It was only a little over a month ago when SWA announced they had 400 aircraft.
 
On Your Six said:
"On the labor side, the company reached a deal last month that gave flight attendants average pay raises of 31 percent over six years.

Gary Kelly, who replaced James Parker as chief executive last month, said in a recent interview that Southwest was ``pushing the boundary of what we can afford with our wages.''


Hmmmmmm. I'll bet that even Southwest is starting to consider its own wage strucutre in light of wage cutbacks elsewhere and competitive fare reductions.... The domino effect in action!
As opposed to saying "We still have plenty of room for labor wage increases." Don't care what shape they are in, he STILL would have said the former. Much harder for him to prove to labor that they are soon to be "struggling."

"I failed English!?!?! That's unpossible."
 
You speak gooder English than me do.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Since when did USAir become anything comparable to a mom and pop store?

Please. That's a pathetic analogy, with so many errors on so many different levels.

I seem to remember MetroJet being put together solely to take on Southwest. Don't act like USAir wouldn't have put Southwest out of business if they could have.

If being the Wal-Mart of the sky means that we provide a quality product at a lower price, then so be it. Welcome to capitalism.
 
LUVchild;


Somehow I think that describing travel on SWA as a "quality product"is a little bit of a stretch. Efficent ? Yes. Sucessful? Without a doubt.Wish I we're there instead of here? You betcha! But "quality product"? I don't think so. For that you have to turn the clock back 30 years and travel first class on what are now known today as the legacy carriers. Now THAT was a "quality product" if there ever was one!


PHXFLYR :cool:
 
I would definine quality as perhaps something different than you do, I suppose. To me, quality is a product doing exactly what it says it will, at a decent cost...if that makes sense.

Southwest doesn't pretend to be United First Class. They don't promise frills, movies, and meals. They say that they'll provide you with friendly Customer Service experience, get you from Point A to Point B, and provide you with a soft drink and small snack. Generally ontime, with your luggage intact.

I agree that the legacy carriers had some amazing service, but only for those who could afford it. And let's face it, those that could even begin to afford it were by far the minority. I wouldn't call those "quality" experiences, as you paid out the nose for them in most cases, far more than the actual amenities were worth. In my mind, I would call those luxury experiences.

And the sad thing is that when the economy takes a downturn, luxury items are usually the first things to get cut from personal and corporate budgets.

All this to say that I think the Wal-Mart analogy for Southwest, though cute and popular to those in this industry, is completely off-base. :)
 
We are Borg..Resistance is futile..
 

Latest resources

Back
Top