Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Sensible answers to some 9/11 Questions

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Makesheepnervus said:
Still waiting for you to post this NTSB Flight Data Recorder information you keep talking about RJ................

!!

Well.. since you obviously wont visit the site.. i guess i can copy and paste it here. Let me know if you need the csv file from the FDR.

Flight Data Recorder Analysis
Last Second of Data
09:37:44
08/20/06
We have determined based on the Flight Data Recorder information that has been analyzed thus far provided by the NTSB, that it is impossible for this aircraft to have struck down the light poles.
We have an animation of the entire flight provided by the NTSB. I have sat through the whole flight from taxi out at Dulles... to the impact at the Pentagon in real time.
The screenshot below shows the very last frame of the recorded data. Its stops at 9:37:44 AM EDT (Official Impact Time is 09:37:45). You will notice in the right margin the altitude of the aircraft on the middle instrument. It shows 180 feet. This altitude has been determined to reflect Pressure altitude as set by 29.92 inHg on the Altimeter. The actual local pressure for DCA at impact time was 30.22 inHg. The error for this discrepancy is 300 feet. Meaning, the actual aircraft altitude was 300 feet higher than indicated at that moment in time. Which means aircraft altitude was 480 feet above sea level (MSL, 75 foot margin for error according to Federal Aviation Regulations). You can clearly see the highway in the below screenshot directly under the aircraft. The elevation for that highway is ~40 feet above sea level according to Google Earth. The light poles would have had to been 440 feet tall (+/- 75 feet) for this aircraft to bring them down. Which you can clearly see in the below picture, the aircraft is too high, even for the official released video of the 5 frames where you see something cross the Pentagon Lawn at level attitude. The 5 frames of video captured by the parking gate cam is in direct conflict with the Aircraft Flight Data Recorder information released by the NTSB. More information will be forthcoming as we come to our conclusions on each issue. We have contacted the NTSB regarding the conflict between the official story and the FDR. They refuse to comment.​



For a more in depth analysis on altimeter settings, please see right margin.The FDR Research Team​

 
Last edited:
As for your skillful pilot who was refused to rent a 172 because he couldnt control it at 65 knots...

Animation from the NTSB of the FDR. (The NTSB made this animation, commentary was inserted)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzR-q0ijbV0

And before you comment on the altitudes.. please do me a favor and do your research as this altimeter was set to 29.92 (as analyzed through FL180 prior in the animation, combined with being matched with the csv file pressure altitude parameter column) and local DCA weather was...
SPECI KDCA 111341Z 33010KT 10SM CLR 23/14 A3022
 
Last edited:
Do us a favor, next time you go in for a medical tell your examiner all of this.
 
He already knows... hes part of Pilots For Truth...

along with pilots from CO, AMR, jB, Boeing, the FAA.. etc.

edit: whoops.. almost forgot our pilots from the USAF as well...

ALPA and the APA are also being contacted.


Be sure to step on that ball now...lol
 
Last edited:
- Pilot experience includes type ratings in MD-88, CRJ, 737, 757, 767, 747, DC-10, J-41, several corporate types.

- The Flight Data Recorder Research Team consists of Professionals/Experts in Computers for decoding files.. pilots of course to interpret the data, experts from Boeing to help interpret the data, and research experts such as Merc and Russel Pickering.

http://pilotsfor911truth.bravehost.com/credandexper.html

I have to update the page.. we are over 20 pilots now. Site has only been up a week or so.
 
RJPilott said:
Be sure to step on that ball now...lol

Sure, don't forget your medication.
 
America is doomed when people start to attack those who question their govt.

Im glad you are in the minority. But dont worry, we're trying to keep govt in check for you too.

I suppose you would want to jail dissenters as well.

:rolleyes:
 
The altimeters in holographic airplanes are often off by 300 feet.
 
He asked for NTSB FDR data, NOT the "official" review that a slanted pilot group wrote. Provide the actual data from the FDR.
 
Elvis was in the building!!!

It's too bad that they were taking Elvis and JFK on a tour of the WTC on 9/11. I heard that Elvis was the one that made the first call to the fire department. His voice is clearly heard ....they have the tape on the same website. I forgot the site but I'm sure that RJ could point you towards it.:nuts:
 
RJPilott said:
America is doomed when people start to attack those who question their govt.

Im glad you are in the minority. But dont worry, we're trying to keep govt in check for you too.

Question away, but you should expect certain treatment when you call others sheep for not agreeing with you. You have the burden of proof remember.

I suppose you would want to jail dissenters as well.

:rolleyes:

Here is a helpful link to logical fallacies and their descriptions for your future reference.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
 
The FDR flight path data for [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]American Airlines Flight 77[/FONT], showing the altitude to be approximately zero at impact, is here:

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc02.pdf

Of course, why bother with data? We know that the goverment has mind control rays and holographic projectors that cause eye witnesses to see airplanes where there are no airplanes. We certainly can also assume that anything that doesn't fit into our fantasy world view is just a product of the super-efficent diabolical super-villians who control EVERYTHING!
 
Guess you guys are enjoying jousting with this nerfherder.

Wonder where all those many, many supporters he's listed are? Isn't it odd that not one of that group, or any group has posted in support.

Oh yeah, they're all busy looking for the airframes, all the crews, and all the passengers who WEREN'T really on those planes.

wackowackowackowackowacko

Heeeeerrrrrreeeeee's Johnny!


Fugawe
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom