Sensible answers to some 9/11 Questions

[Makesheepnervus]

Thanks Jim, glad to have on board.

As I mentioned earlier I think it's about time we started asking the conspiracy theorists the questions, let's see how well their theories stand up to scrutiny.

If you take the time to visit some or all of the sites I have listed below....

http://www.911myths.com/

http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/

http://www.debunking911.com/

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=1&c=y

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html

http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/

.....you will find that every quote given, every picture shown, every piece of video has been edited, shown incompletely or taken out of context. Take for example, a reporter quoted as saying he saw a "cruise missile" hit the pentagon. Here is the complete un-edited video;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz-Qi5EJmXA

But, returning to my original theme, if you are not interested in sensible answers then lay out your entire alternative theory along with supporting proof for us to examine.

 

[RJPilott]

All of that deals with the BS smoke screens of missles and pod theories... and regurgitates theory by the NIST for which they were awarded (mixed in with a bit of ridicule).

As i said.. Loose Change is not the end all be all. They focus mainly on Loose Change because Loose Change has been the most popular to wake people up to start their own research. Loose Change is a tiny spec of the tip of the iceberg. Although is continually in the google top ten. It gets people to start their research. .as i said.


Please find a site that debunks the NTSB Flight Data Recorder...

Please find a site that proves it was gravity and fire which brought down WTC 7. (not theory)

Please find a site that explains the HUGE round holes in WTC 5 and 6 (without collapse mind you).

Please find a site that explains "No one could have imagined it", yet we have Operation Northwoods suggesting exactly that as a false flag op just recently declassified...

Please find a site that debunks Able Danger.


C'mon people.. you really think others are that dumb? Keep trying sheep!

 

[RJPilott]

You ask all great questions... and if you research.. most will be found..

One i'll entertain.. (since im doing my own research and dont have time for you)...

Is that Rumsfled announced 2.3 trillion missing from the Pentagon Budget on Sept 10, 2001. Only to be trumped in the news with Sept 11, 2001. No one ever questioned the missing money again...

As for explosives used.. they can explain why they didnt check all they want.. but until they test for explosives.. and find there werent any.. .the point is moot.. right?

Steve Jones, PhD BYU, was able to get some samples of steel and DID test for explosives.. which came up positive.

 

[RJPilott]

You guys are going to have a hard time asking me questions on my thoeries.. when i havent offered ANY...

(when are you guys going to get this FACT through your thick skulls?)

Name one thoery i have offered... please.. just one.

Then after that.. PROVE to us.. beyond theory, how the WTC collapsed...

Perhaps theory is good enough for you to go off to war and fight for Bush.. .its not for me.

Then, after you get done trying to prove NIST and govt theory (which you cant)...

Explain the Flight Data Recorder from the NTSB and explain why it is in direct conflict with the official theory.


If you guys can unwrap your dunce brains for a second from the bullsh1t missle and pod theories.. perhaps we can start to work on the facts that you ignore post after post.

 

[Makesheepnervus]

Still waiting for you to post this NTSB Flight Data Recorder information you keep talking about RJ................

By the way I have seen the NTSB's flight path data and that just proves what piss poor "pilots" were at the controls;
The plane would fly nice and straight and level until each time they turned off the auto pilot, when the aircraft would show major altitude deviations. The aircraft was heading more or less straight at the pentagon until a few miles away when the "pilot" had to execute a 330 degree turn because if he didn't he was going to overshoot due to poor descent planning. I presume this is the "skillfull manouvering" we keep hearing about, of course the term "skillfull" being applied in this case is a joke; The guy crashed the plane!!!

 

[Makesheepnervus]

Oh, and don't take my word for it, here is the link to the NTSB flight path study for flight 77

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc02.pdf

Look at page 7 pay attention to notes "E" and "F" and look at the altitude deviations each time the auto pilot is disengaged.

Skillfull Pilots, MY ASS!!!

 

[RJPilott]

Still waiting for you to post this NTSB Flight Data Recorder information you keep talking about RJ................

!!

Well.. since you obviously wont visit the site.. i guess i can copy and paste it here. Let me know if you need the csv file from the FDR.

Flight Data Recorder Analysis
Last Second of Data
09:37:44
08/20/06​

We have determined based on the Flight Data Recorder information that has been analyzed thus far provided by the NTSB, that it is impossible for this aircraft to have struck down the light poles.
We have an animation of the entire flight provided by the NTSB. I have sat through the whole flight from taxi out at Dulles... to the impact at the Pentagon in real time.
The screenshot below shows the very last frame of the recorded data. Its stops at 9:37:44 AM EDT (Official Impact Time is 09:37:45). You will notice in the right margin the altitude of the aircraft on the middle instrument. It shows 180 feet. This altitude has been determined to reflect Pressure altitude as set by 29.92 inHg on the Altimeter. The actual local pressure for DCA at impact time was 30.22 inHg. The error for this discrepancy is 300 feet. Meaning, the actual aircraft altitude was 300 feet higher than indicated at that moment in time. Which means aircraft altitude was 480 feet above sea level (MSL, 75 foot margin for error according to Federal Aviation Regulations). You can clearly see the highway in the below screenshot directly under the aircraft. The elevation for that highway is ~40 feet above sea level according to Google Earth. The light poles would have had to been 440 feet tall (+/- 75 feet) for this aircraft to bring them down. Which you can clearly see in the below picture, the aircraft is too high, even for the official released video of the 5 frames where you see something cross the Pentagon Lawn at level attitude. The 5 frames of video captured by the parking gate cam is in direct conflict with the Aircraft Flight Data Recorder information released by the NTSB. More information will be forthcoming as we come to our conclusions on each issue. We have contacted the NTSB regarding the conflict between the official story and the FDR. They refuse to comment.​

http://pilotsfor911truth.bravehost.com/myPictures/44.JPG​

http://pilotsfor911truth.bravehost.com/pentagon.html​

For a more in depth analysis on altimeter settings, please see right margin.The FDR Research Team​

Phone call to NTSB and FBI​

 

[RJPilott]

As for your skillful pilot who was refused to rent a 172 because he couldnt control it at 65 knots...

Animation from the NTSB of the FDR. (The NTSB made this animation, commentary was inserted)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzR-q0ijbV0

And before you comment on the altitudes.. please do me a favor and do your research as this altimeter was set to 29.92 (as analyzed through FL180 prior in the animation, combined with being matched with the csv file pressure altitude parameter column) and local DCA weather was...
SPECI KDCA 111341Z 33010KT 10SM CLR 23/14 A3022

 

[TrafficInSight]

Do us a favor, next time you go in for a medical tell your examiner all of this.

 

[RJPilott]

He already knows... hes part of Pilots For Truth...

along with pilots from CO, AMR, jB, Boeing, the FAA.. etc.

edit: whoops.. almost forgot our pilots from the USAF as well...

ALPA and the APA are also being contacted.


Be sure to step on that ball now...lol