Saddam Captured!!!!!!!!!!

[empenage]

Geeez merikeyegro....Find a paper bag and breath into it.

Then go to the supermarket and get a case or two of SAM-e.

 

[2000flyer]

Merikeyegro and the other liberals, you'll probably revell in reading this link from NewsMax.com

To think anyone, and I mean ANYONE would go as far as to think, or even say outloud for that matter, that the democrats need another 9/11 style attack to beat Bush ought to be tossed not only from the cushy jobs, but into a cozy cell with their buddies Osama and Sadam.

Those who think we went to war with Iraq for oil sales are completely dillusional. I sure hope you don't have these fantasy dreams while in flight!

Read how former Clintonites view this great news.

I'm typically not one to voice on political matters on a message board, but really folks, what does it take to make some of you happy? Oh yeah, I remember, a brutal, murdering, terrorist financing dictator still in power, not in jail.

 

[AceCrackshot]

To all those who don't think capturing SH is good for our country or this war is about Halliburton. I have one question.

Will the capture and eventual trial of a despot, acknowledged by his supporters and allies to be one of the most heartless, cruel men to inhabit a heartless, cruel century, have a moderating effect on other dictators and despots who wage unrestricted warfare on their populations?

Why or why not?

 

[414Flyer]

In honor of our troops/sailors/airmen I made a little celebratory video. Here's the link lemme know if it actually works.

http://www.angelfire.com/pro/woody/freeiraq.WMV

Keep it up and we will have another Grouchymedia.com on our hands

 

[Draginass]

Probably not. These kind of megomaniacs are think they're immortal.

There will be some satisfaction seeing the great Sadaam and his henchmen doin' the dance at the end of an Iraqi rope.

 

[EagleRJ]

also from the Dean supporters:

_____________________________________


Rene:

WHACK! Oh, but I'm getting so painfully close to my limit. I'm addicted to donating to Dean. What am I going to do when I can't give anymore money?

Posted by Invincible Dean at December 14, 2003 10:04 AM

_____________________________________


I'm glad there are people who are this gullible in the US today.

 

[Be200pilot]

Liberal or conservative, the title doesnt matter, they are all puppets of special interest groups anyways.
However I do think Bush is a decent man, but the recent cabotage vote has hit a little too close to home for me. Republicans were the main force behind passing it, which could potentialy put myself and other family members out of work in the not too distant future.

 

[dash8driver]

to all the idiots that think that finally capturing saddam is somehow bad for us...

wake up... the anti-coalition countries...even france (your mecca) is happy about this capture... chirac said he's "delighted". congratulations.. you've just passed up the french in being the most disillusioned and idiotic people on the planet.

and for those who think this is bad for the democratic campaign... holy sh!t...get some perspective for once. and if thats all you got for a campaign then you're pretty sorry.

i have to agree with be200pilot, i'm not too happy about the cabotage vote and what it may be the start of.

 

[dash8driver]

almost forgot...heres a nice photo of your hero...

http://home.austin.rr.com/slimetnr/spiderhole.jpg

 

[Q200_FO]

What if this is true?

Now, how would this put a spin on things? I'm not saying it's bad that he was caught. I'm more of a realist. But what if he was pulling everybodys leg in regards to the WMD's?
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/15/sprj.irq.main/index.html

 

[dash8driver]

exactly what part of that article are you referring to?

 

[Typhoon1244]

Remember the six captured pilots that Saddam paraded in front of the cameras during the first Gulf War? Especially that British Tornado back-seater, the guy who'd obviously had the sh_t kicked out of him?

They should let those guys have Saddam in a small room for about half-an-hour...

 

[Vladimir Lenin]

fawk Saddam, where's Scott Speicher?

 

[chawbein]

Re: What if this is true?

Now, how would this put a spin on things? I'm not saying it's bad that he was caught. I'm more of a realist. But what if he was pulling everybodys leg in regards to the WMD's?
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/15/sprj.irq.main/index.html

So what if he was? You mess with the bull, you get the horns. If an airplane you were flying had a guy in back that said he had a grenade and you have your lucky .45 in the cockpit. Would you hesitate to put one in the head and two in the chest, or would you demand to see the weapon first?

Just a small point.

 

[Timebuilder]

But what if he was pulling everybodys leg in regards to the WMD's?

We already know that there were WMD's, confirmed by inspectors. What we are not 100% certain about is the destruction of ALL of the WMD's. This seems doubtful, since Sadaam was an uncooperative guy, to say the least.

What is more likely, I think, is that Sadaam managed to hide or remove the WMD's to Syria while we screwed around trying to get some sort of "permission" from the UN to go in and do what needed to be done according to 1441 and the peace agreement.

Yes, it was good for PR, but a bad strategic move.

 

[uscpilot]

Re: ...

Until he does, however, enjoy your lack of overtime pay, lack of unemployment checks, and the weakened states of your respective labor unions.

Lack of overtime?? If companies are laying off wouldnt the remaining workers have to pickup the slack with overtime ?
With unemployment going down there will be fewer unemployment checks. Besides unemoployment is only a stop gap, not an endless social service. If it was unending there would not be any incentive to get a job.
Weakened labor unions? We can only hope.
usc

 

[Singlecoil]

Why would he lie about WMD's?

Well, Israel actually has the bomb, and has attacked Iraq before (air strike on nuclear plant). We have a long way to go before we will understand the Arab mind, but I don't think it is a stretch that he would exaggerate his arsenal to intimidate Israel and improve his standing among fellow Arabs. The question remains why our intelligence was so poor to not pick up on this deception.

...and please don't give me the crap about gassing the Kurds. Yes it was reprehensible, but if we were so outraged by that, why didn't we say anything at the time, and why did Donald Rumsfeld meet Hussein and shake his hand after the fact? That's because we liked the fact that he was fighting Islamic fundamentalists in Iran at the time.
Now he is gone, and we expect the Sunnis, Shiite, Kurds, and march Arabs to live happily ever after inside a border created not along ethnic or political lines, but an arbitrary one created by the British Empire. I sincerely hope we can pull that off, but is going to be a monumentally difficult task.
In this country we have grown accustomed to having our ideal candidate lose, but still on some level rallying around our president, knowing that we can kick him out of office in four years if he really screws up. Will the Shiites stand by while a Sunni president acts in a manner they find disagreeable? Or vice-versa? The idea that removing Hussein will lead to stability in the middle east certainly remains to be seen.