RSW Notam discrepency

[mlifly]

RSW Notam discrepancy

Ran into this situation a couple weeks ago.
Flying the SHFTY1 arrival into RSW, for 24 arrivals, the chart instructions are to Depart MOEMO heading 220.
There is a Notam published for the SHFTY1 that says when landing 24, depart LBV on a 190 heading. The problem here is that per the arrival, we don't ever fly to LBV in the first place.
In our case, after seeing us turn at MOEMO, the controller queried us and asked if we had the Notam regarding the turn at LBV. We called the controller on the ground to discuss it and explained our discrepency. He further told us that everyone was "screwing it up". Seems to me that if an ambiguos Notam is issued and everyone is screwing it up, then maybe it's the Notam that's screwed up.?
Any RSW controllers out there with any insight on this???

 

[jaxpilot]

Wait, you actually landed on 24? The 15 or so times I have been there its always on landing and departing on 6 so I haven't had the issue with the arrival- something to look out for though.

 

[CRJDispatchKid]

Here is the NOTAM as of tonight:

12/011 RSW AIRSPACE SHFTY ONE ARRIVAL (RNAV) AMEND AS FOLLOWS:
LANDING RSW RWY 24 AND FMY: FROM OVER MOEMO PROCEED DIRECT LBV,
DEPART LBV VIA 190 DEG HEADING. EXPECT RADAR VECTORS.

 

[Tired Soul]

Rumor has it they call it the "SH*TTY ONE" arrival..

 

[mlifly]

Here is the NOTAM as of tonight:

12/011 RSW AIRSPACE SHFTY ONE ARRIVAL (RNAV) AMEND AS FOLLOWS:
LANDING RSW RWY 24 AND FMY: FROM OVER MOEMO PROCEED DIRECT LBV,
DEPART LBV VIA 190 DEG HEADING. EXPECT RADAR VECTORS.

CRJ-
Thanks for posting the Notam. I was in there a week after having the issue and the Notam hadn't been changed. I guess they finally did. Thanks.
ML