Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun


Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web


Active member
Nov 26, 2001
Hey birddog, I am not saying that that c-152 is a bad trainer. Is has it's ranks in the training business. However I believe that the 172 is simply a better suited aircraft. As far as being unsafe try taking a 15 year old 152 off from a 4000 ft. strip in the dead of summer with 60 ft. obstacles at the end of the runway. Now for a seasoned pilot this shouldn't pose a problem, but for a student soloing I like a little more leway. A little more horsepower means a little more insurance. Also add better forward visibility, longer range for those solo x/c ies and better stall characteristics are just a few of the other advantages I can think of. I did all of my initial training in a 152 and have logged over 400hr in each type. AS an instructor you feel a lot of responsibitiy for your students, and I always feel better when they depart in a 172 vs. 152.

Latest resources