Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Regulate 'em, Crandall says

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Bai B Nai

902 Wins
Joined
May 10, 2002
Posts
72
Back from the dead....

Crandall Calls For Re-Regulation



Jun 11, 2008
By Anthony L. Velocci, Jr./Aviation Daily

Decrying the “sad state” of U.S. commercial aviation, former American Chairman and CEO Robert Crandall yesterday declared three decades of deregulation a failure and said that treating airlines like a regulated utility must be a part of a broad solution to their current financial crisis.
“We have failed to confront the reality that unfettered competition just doesn’t work very well in certain industries, as aptly demonstrated by our airline experience and by the adverse outcomes associated with various state efforts to deregulate electricity rates,” Crandall told aviation and financial industry professionals gathered at the Wings Club in New York City. “It’s time to acknowledge that airlines look and are more like utilities than ordinary businesses.”
While the rapid rise in jet fuel prices has complicated the job of airline managers, fuel prices are not at the core of the industry’s precarious financial state. Inadequate scale isn’t to blame either, he added.
“The arguments in favor of consolidation are unpersuasive,” he said. “Mergers will not lower fuel prices, and they will not increase economies of scale for already sizable major airlines. If consolidation were really the answer, it is conceivable the system could be run by a single efficient operator.”
Instead, Crandall continued, the industry’s goal should be to harness competition and regulation to create a system responsive to both the imperative of efficiency and the desirability of decent service — now unacceptable “by any standard.”

In addition to reregulation, Crandall called for:
• Overhauling price structures to “recapture” full costs and earn the profits needed to sustain the huge investments essential to the industry’s future.
• Amending the Railway Labor Act to require binding arbitration to encourage both labor and management to adopt more moderate positions than has been true in the past while simultaneously moving all airlines closer to labor-cost parity.
• Revising U.S. bankruptcy laws to deprive failed carriers of the right to use lower costs to undercut the fares offered by “their more prudent rivals.”
• Regulating the number of flights scheduled to what runways, terminals and air traffic control facilities at airports can handle.
• Shrinking schedules proportionately to each airline’s current frequency share as a way to pressure carriers to use the largest feasible aircraft in each slot.
• Imposing more stringent financial standards that new airlines must meet to eliminate or discourage “short-term antics” by start-ups that have destabilized the pricing structure required by a healthy industry.
• A more accommodating stance by Washington towards industry collaboration to achieve more intensive asset utilization and more efficient operations.
Crandall also noted, however, that industry regulation will be insufficient to rescue the commercial air transportation industry. Also needed is a national transportation plan of U.S. aviation goals, including a comprehensive redesign of the air traffic control system. “Unhappily,” he added, “such a plan does not exist.”
 
Amending the Railway Labor Act to require binding arbitration to encourage both labor and management to adopt more moderate positions than has been true in the past while simultaneously moving all airlines closer to labor-cost parity.
Please excuse me, but I need this one explained. "Labor-Cost parity"? Does that mean more work for less money? Otherwise, I agree with him.
 
Eliminate BK protection and the only the stongest will survive.

Eliminate free market competition and the consumer as well as the industry employees suffer.

F'n democrats. Get a life.
 
Thank God for Bob Crandall. (Can't believe I just said that) Except for the gratuitous anti-labor job he threw in there (Crandall just can't help himself on that), he is absolutely right. Crandall was against deregulation in the first place, and he has been proven right. Time to go back to what works.
 
American has had thirty years to get their act together. That is all I need to know.
 


"You f*cking academic eggheads! You don't know sh*t. You can't deregulate this industry. You're going to wreck it. You don't know a goddamn thing!"


— Robert L. Crandall, CEO American Airlines, addressing a Senate lawyer prior to airline deregulation, 1977.
 
Last edited:


"You f*cking academic eggheads! You don't know sh*t. You can't deregulate this industry. You're going to wreck it. You don't know a goddamn thing!"


— Robert L. Crandall, CEO American Airlines, addressing a Senate lawyer prior to airline deregulation, 1977.

Yeah, I remember reading that one. I think he also pretty much admitted in court to illegal price colluding, even when things were regulated.

Not sure I agree with the above anti-intellectual quote. On the other hand, President Eisenhower had this to say about egg-heads:

"An intellectual is a man who takes more words than necessary to tell more
than he knows."

(ouch!)
 
Eliminate BK protection and the only the stongest will survive.

Eliminate free market competition and the consumer as well as the industry employees suffer.

F'n democrats. Get a life.

Hmmm. I believe the Republicans have bankrupted the country, led us into a war without end, and presided over the massive decline of the US airline industry.

If you want to eliminate BK protection for airlines, then it has to apply for everybody, not just airlines.

The "gubment" needs to have a coherent energy and air transportation policy. Mr. Bush and his fellow Republicans have proven for 8 years that they don't have a clue about either.

The airline industry is way too capital intensive to run like small town taxi industry. If that's ok with the country, then it deserves the kind wild swings in service and prices that it gets. Just like it's been said . . . "every people get the kind of government they deserve." Looks like we deserve a corrupt, incompetent and dishonest government.

Time to make a change. Anything has to be better than the sick clown-show who's running it now.
 
Zero-sum game?

We should probably keep in mind that many of the pilots on this forum owe their jobs to deregulation. It also cost many pilots their jobs, but they moved on to other career fields and don't post here. In the same way, re-regulation might help some but would certainly hurt others. Passengers will squeal about "high" ticket prices, and then politicians will once again call for deregulation. :blush:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom