Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Radio Altimeter vs. Barometric Altimeter

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

dapilot

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2003
Posts
25
Wouldn't it be a good idea when descending on an ILS approach, to use your "radio altimeter" and use the "DH" to judge when you arrive at your landing minimums instead of using your "barometric altimeter" and "DA?" I would think the RA would be much more accurate then all the errors associated with the barometric altimeter, especially during pressure changes such as when t-storms start and end, frontal passages and along frontal lines. Barometric altimeters are subject to +/- 75 foot errors which could mean the difference between landing and deciding to go missed !

Just a thought - would like to hear others' opinions :D
 
RA is great but has some terrain based limitations.
Can't have a large elevation change (ditch/road/valley) right before the runway.

Anywhere there is scaffolding/trusswork supporting the approach lights (SEA, PIT, CRW etc..) it's a red flag.

In SEA, RA is not authorized for CATII.
http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0708/00582I16CC2.PDF
 
Last edited:
hmm i agree with you but what about airports where it is level in front of the runway, or where there are CAT 2 and 3 approaches? why not use RA for the CAT 1 approach on the approaches which also have CAT 2 and 3?
 
Nothing stops you from doing that as a backup to your altimeter, but you'll be surprised at how irregular terrain that appears flat, can be.
 
I was researching/editing while you were responding. By all means, RA is great. Just make sure it's authorized, be safe and have fun.
Always a good idea to cross-check everything you are able to, though.
 
Last edited:
I was researching/editing while you were responding. By all means, RA is great. Just make sure it's authorized, be safe and have fun.
Always a good idea to cross-check everything you are able to, though.

what do you mean "authorized?" (besides CAT 2 and 3) Where would it say it is or is not authorized? (for CAT 1) You have any examples of this on any approach plate? All approach plates show a "DH" and a "DA".... so why couldn't I use a "DH"? :) (playing devils advocate)
 
Last edited:
If it says DH, use it.:D

If it says "RA NA", as in the example posted above, it's not authorized.

I couldn't find any other examples online. Jepps don't put the stuff out there for free and it's been about 10 years since I've held an NOS plate.

If it's not authorized, it should say in the profile view, in the Approach Minimums, as a note in the corner of the plan view, or possibly on the back of the 10-9. My plates are at work, so I can't really research it.
 
Last edited:
Short answer....DH is HAT (height above touchdown zone elevation not height AGL). RA only applies when the jepps show "RA" as the minimums (CAT II or III) These have been flight tested and surveyed to show actual RA. When at DH the RA that you show can vary quite a bit from the HAT that you would expect, some show quite a bit above 200' others show less than 200'. Like old Chris Columbus and others found out way back....the world ain't flat!
 
what do you mean "authorized?" (besides CAT 2 and 3) Where would it say it is or is not authorized? (for CAT 1) You have any examples of this on any approach plate? All approach plates show a "DH" and a "DA".... so why couldn't I use a "DH"? :) (playing devils advocate)
If you've got a radar altimeter that can show DH on a Cat I approach, go for it.

I've never seen one, though. All of the ones I've flown only show your height above the terrain underneath you, not your height above terrain half a mile in front of you.

Fly safe!

David
 
Radar is more difficult to use because of the scalloping due to the terrain. You might hit your DH 2-3 times on the radar prior to the actual Decision Height".

"approaching minimums! oh wait not yet...now! approaching miniums!! no no...oh yeah there it is minimums minimums.

Additionally as someone else has pointed out - the DH published is a HAT not an AGL.

At the end of the day I think it comes down to the fact that you can probably use radar safely a lot of the time if you know the approach is a flat field, not a lot of uneven terrain or buildings on short-final and the airport is not on/in a plateu/valley like Billings, MT or SEA-TAC. However, an aircrew with no information about any of the above mentioned needs to be able to operate into the airport with the same procedure all the time.

A CAT-I approach does not require the precision of a radar-altimeter so it is not flight tested utilizing one - so if you do it, you (and your pax) become the flight-test pilot. If they designed the approaches to utilize the precision of a Radar Altimeter then you would be required to have an RA installed in your 172 before you could fly IFR and AOPA would go ape s*hit.

Later




Later
 
All of the more regulatory stuff above is absolutely correct, but from a practical standpoint using RA on a CAT I ILS is no bueno.

Like the guy said, watch the RA move around underneath you on any approach outside the flatest of flatlands. There's just no way that it can be reliably used. Sometimes it's a little scary when you're IMC....Charlie West seems to stick out in my mind, and a few others in Colorado.
 
Read the pubs...

MINIMUM DESCENT ALTITUDE, DECISION ALTITUDE,
AND DECISION HEIGHT​
MDA and DA are referenced to MSL and measured
with a barometric altimeter. CAT II and III
approach DHs are referenced to AGL and measured
with a radio altimeter.
The height above touchdown (HAT) for a CAT I
precision approach is normally 200 feet above
touchdown zone elevation (TDZE). When a HAT of
250 feet or higher is published, it may be the result
of the signal-in-space coverage, or there may be
penetrations of either the final or missed approach
obstacle clearance surfaces (OCSs). If there are
OCS penetrations, the pilot will have no indication
on the approach chart where the obstacles are
located. It is important for pilots to brief the MDA,
DA, or DH so that there is no ambiguity as to what
minimums are being used. These altitudes can be
restricted by many factors. Approach category,
inoperative equipment in the aircraft or on the
ground, crew qualifications, and company authorizations
are all examples of issues that may limit or change the​
height of a published MDA, DA, or DH.

http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/aviation/instrument_procedures_handbook/media/CH-05.pdf

See pg 5-18
 
thnx for all the feedback guys ! really clears things up now :)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top