LJDRVR
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 1,134
Hey folks,
doing some research here, and was wondering for those of us who train regularly in simulators, be it brand "S", brand "F", military, airline or combination of above. During recurrent or a PC, we often have a limited amount of time available to complete certain maneuvers. The Instuctor is on a timeline, and those of us who are experienced in the airframe we're flying can often sense this. As we have flown these procedures many times before, the temptation here is to "help the IP out a little." For instance, maybe taking a turn onto the localizer even though we're feeling a bit rushed or haven't briefed as thoroughly as we would in the jet if it was "for real" We rationalize this by telling ourself that we've "got it all under control, and by god, I've done ________(insert abnormal) a MILLION times in this dumb box." My questions are:
1. Am I the only one who has ever done this? (I suspect not based on folks I've talked to.)
2. Has anyone ever had an abnormal in the actual aircraft where they felt they "rushed things along" more than they should have? If so, does anyone attribute this to the old "fly like you train" adage. (You pushed things occasionaly in the sim to stay on timeline, when "it" happened for real you did the same thing in the jet)
My supposition is that there MAY be a human factors issue here in the industry related to the law of exercise. Particularly with those of us who have flown the same airframe for a while and have become very comfortable and adept with anything the aircraft throws us.
Am I full of it? Any constructive responses are greatly appreciated.
Feel free to PM me if you don't feel comfortable posting your experience on a public website.
THANKS!
doing some research here, and was wondering for those of us who train regularly in simulators, be it brand "S", brand "F", military, airline or combination of above. During recurrent or a PC, we often have a limited amount of time available to complete certain maneuvers. The Instuctor is on a timeline, and those of us who are experienced in the airframe we're flying can often sense this. As we have flown these procedures many times before, the temptation here is to "help the IP out a little." For instance, maybe taking a turn onto the localizer even though we're feeling a bit rushed or haven't briefed as thoroughly as we would in the jet if it was "for real" We rationalize this by telling ourself that we've "got it all under control, and by god, I've done ________(insert abnormal) a MILLION times in this dumb box." My questions are:
1. Am I the only one who has ever done this? (I suspect not based on folks I've talked to.)
2. Has anyone ever had an abnormal in the actual aircraft where they felt they "rushed things along" more than they should have? If so, does anyone attribute this to the old "fly like you train" adage. (You pushed things occasionaly in the sim to stay on timeline, when "it" happened for real you did the same thing in the jet)
My supposition is that there MAY be a human factors issue here in the industry related to the law of exercise. Particularly with those of us who have flown the same airframe for a while and have become very comfortable and adept with anything the aircraft throws us.
Am I full of it? Any constructive responses are greatly appreciated.
Feel free to PM me if you don't feel comfortable posting your experience on a public website.
THANKS!
Last edited: