COOPERVANE
Member since 1967
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2002
- Posts
- 2,167
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, why is it OK for mainline pilots to want to take my regional job...but not the other way around? That's not OK, is it?
...I'm still employed at ASa, so I want ASa to grow! If that means taking planes from mainline, so be it! I'm not falling on my sword for anyone! Should I make it to another carrier, then I'll be fighting to keep scope.
So, why is it OK for mainline pilots to want to take my regional job...but not the other way around? That's not OK, is it?
Yes it is. Your job is/has been a loaner per the mainlines Section 1. Your job is more like seasonal help.
Both johnpeace and outtahere never went to college, and most likely got kicked out of highschool before finishing. They want to stay in the minor leagues because they really don't have a chance for the Majors, and they love eating fast food, forever. Aim low guys, aim low.
OYS
Why can't Regionals grow AND Mainline grow together. Tie regional growth to mainline additions. 1 new RJ for connection and feed for every 1 mainline airframe. Nobody taking anything that way.
Management doesn't lose, they keep their pay at the next endeavor. Labor, particularly pilots are left in the cold. What a great way to keep labor costs rock bottom, hit the reset button every 10 years.
Yep. Nothing more worthless to management then a topped out RJ captain. Eagle will be the next to fall. Stay at a 'top dog' regional long enough and you will get the Comair treatment eventually.
Just a friendly reminder that the ONLY reason there are CR7/9s and E170/75s flying around at the regional level is that they were forced in BANKRUPTCY.
Good day
Swing and a miss!!!! UAL scope relaxed in contract 2000 when the "heavy" guys were promised more widebodies! Woops!!!!
F that, all those 70's should be at mainline, or parked and replaced with narrow body equipment being flown at mainline.
Are mainline pilots are willing to be a CRJ 700 CA for $88/hr? Really? Oh, we'll fly them for no less than $120. I see. Looks like the regionals aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
I think it is really funny when people say regional’s stole flying.. Most likely the 737/727 wasn't full enough to be economical or pax wanted more frequency that isn't cost effective for mainline. You can say all you want about fuel, but i bet running a CRJ/EMB 5 times a day between ord and okc is still far cheaper than running an 80 or 737. Mainline management is also the one to blame. The flying is theirs, they decide where it best serves the customer, stock holders, and the airline. As a FO i go where the company tells me to go. Marketing at mainline tells my airline where to go. I have no say in the matter.
I can understand that. One possible problem may be mainlines own contract and pay rates.. Supposedly the APA's contract with AA states the captain will not make less than the FO...talkin hourly payrates.. I just see no way AA management will allow a CA/FO to fly the 700 for $130/56 an hour, and that is an estimated 2nd year pay below the 80(80 pay rate at $149/75/hr on airline pilot central, I have no idea what the F100 payrates were)I don't think people are arguing that the CRJ or EMB is or isn't better for certain routes. I think the problem is that they aren't flown by mainline pilots. That comes down to management wanting it to happen, and mainline pilots letting it happen.