Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Psa 900 Deal-redux

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

piratebooty

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Posts
15
Company revisted proposal to place 4 900's on property with the same frozen blended rate that was rejected last summer. Union rejected this offer but is ramping up negotiation committe. Stay tuned...
 
I *think* the ramping up of the negotiating committe doesn't have anything to do with the 900s. Just attrition.

And honestly, 4 airplanes? If we said screw you to 30 airplanes why do they think we are going to say ok to 4?
 
Maybe a pirate ship will come along with the nylon polymer they are trying to sell you guys. You boys and girls seem like strong young pups, just tell TK and KH to shove it. What is the movement like for you guys right now?
 
What is the movement like for you guys right now?

From one reserve line to another!
 
Are you talking about Butt Pirates again???


And there is no movement. I THINK they upgraded 6 a few months ago. Nothing planned. JJs are leaving (but have to serve out their 9 month company imposed detention first).
 
I heard a rumor that they were going to offer 9 900s for 70-seat pay straight accross the board. Doing away with the blended rate.

So 70 seat pay for all 3 aircrafts.
 
I dont see a 90 seat rate in there. So my vote is still no and will always be no until they stop slapping me in the face.
 
I dont see a 90 seat rate in there. So my vote is still no and will always be no until they stop slapping me in the face.

The thought is that you'll get 70-seat pay for the 35-ish CRJ-200s, and 70 seat pay for the 9 CRJ-900s. So averaged out it's more money per seat than the current pay.
 
Flying the 200/700/900 for 700 rates makes sense IMO, especially when compared to legacies flying the A319-321 or 757-767 for the same rates. Do I read LOA 8 of your CBA correct when I see that 5th year 701 pay is 69.76/36.95 as of 1/1/07?

Need to get FO pay up to at least 60% of CA pay!!!
 
This really is an insult. With the way they treat us and how poor the FO pay is here I can't see how anyone could in their right mind have voted yes. My response is once again "go ahead and shut this crap hole down!"
 
Has anyone heard anything about new hire classes in the spring. I missed CLT by two spots in the last bid. Hotels are getting expensive.
 
Woo Hoo

Can't wait till they take 10 lines from F/O's for IOE in CLT again in May, April...

Hey OLD MEC thanks for trading away our IOE Protection. Way to screw the F/O's again!
 
Woo Hoo

Can't wait till they take 10 lines from F/O's for IOE in CLT again in May, April...

Hey OLD MEC thanks for trading away our IOE Protection. Way to screw the F/O's again!


I still haven't been able to find another airlines that butt rapes FOs like ours on that deal.

70 seat pay across the board, huh....well maybe I'd say yes to that if the 70 seat rates didn't also SUCK @SS!!!! Selling out now would make saying no in the first place completely pointless...we have to stick to our guns! Puck Farker, TK & KH
 
i think we should take the deal. i saw Diamond Joe in the crew room today and he said if we turn down this deal again, PSA will be sold to al quaeda.
 
Diamond Joe is no longer allowed in the crew rooms after what he pulled telling everyone we were going out of business. I'd contact your union rep.
 
So why is Joe Diamond flying the line anyway? Is he trying to get a job with Southwest?
 
The ball is in your court guys. Supply and demand works both ways and you all deserve a raise for the equipment you are flying.

Good luck.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom