Pro Pilot magazine

[semperfido]

In all these years and all those flight departments on the cover....what happened to them and how soon after appearing .

"the pro pilot curse" happened to them

 

[On Your Six]

Status Check on Previously Profiled Flight Departments

I agree with the statement above. It would be interesting to do a retrospective of previous flight departments profiled. How have their departments changed? What new aircraft are they using? Have any been disbanded? That might be interesting for those of us who have been reading PP for years...

 

[pilotyip]

I get I cruise every issue, I respond to your surveys. You are already kinda the "People Magazine" of the flying world. Make that your niche. Do not try to complete with BCA, AWST, or AIN. Go for expanded Corp flt dept news. Who is getting airplanes, who got out of the fractional flying, who is converting to fractional flying. A list of whom got jobs where in the Corp world. We do not need regional news, it is covered too many other places. In detail review of Corp, accidents would be good. Get some safety experts to comment on what lead to the accidents. You ask, my thoughts

 

[421Driver]

Pro PIlot is a magazine of which my opinion has changed a number of times. I recall the first issue I picked up when I was a 500hr CFI and thought all of the flight department profiles were the coolest places to work. Now as I move along in the flying world, I see what many of the other posters have said. The departments profiled in the pages of Pro Pilot seem to be of the same type. The CEO's probably had an important role with their departments being on the cover. I'm sure they read the articles of months past and think they are running a "great" flight department with all of the great schedules and pay that everyone else has already griped about. I like K.A. Rick's idea on the survey of which companies to profile. I'm sure you could get at least a few of your reasderships' suggestions to answer each month. It could even be a question for every survey, "What Flight dept. would you like to see profiled next month?"

I agree with bigD on photo resolution. In your most recent months, there were pictures that look like they were taken with a camera phone and blown up to try and fill a white space.

I know that there are still CFI's picking up Pro Pilot and wishing for that "shiny jet" that flys from Reno to London. Make them wish for the King Air that flys on a reasonable schedule with reasonable pay. Give them an objective viewpoint on everything you report on.

 

[gern_blanston]

Pro PIlot is a magazine of which my opinion has changed a number of times. I recall the first issue I picked up when I was a 500hr CFI and thought all of the flight department profiles were the coolest places to work. Now as I move along in the flying world, I see what many of the other posters have said. The departments profiled in the pages of Pro Pilot seem to be of the same type. The CEO's probably had an important role with their departments being on the cover. I'm sure they read the articles of months past and think they are running a "great" flight department with all of the great schedules and pay that everyone else has already griped about. I like K.A. Rick's idea on the survey of which companies to profile. I'm sure you could get at least a few of your reasderships' suggestions to answer each month. It could even be a question for every survey, "What Flight dept. would you like to see profiled next month?"

I agree with bigD on photo resolution. In your most recent months, there were pictures that look like they were taken with a camera phone and blown up to try and fill a white space.

I know that there are still CFI's picking up Pro Pilot and wishing for that "shiny jet" that flys from Reno to London. Make them wish for the King Air that flys on a reasonable schedule with reasonable pay. Give them an objective viewpoint on everything you report on.

Exactly what he said.

 

[Peardc10]

Pro Pilot Magazine

I have been reading your magazine for many years and think your magazine has many merits and some short comings. I believe you have a feel for what pilots think of Pro Pilot Magazine based on these posts and I agree with what many individuals have written.

My 2 cents:

What I like....

I like your articals regarding WX-always interesting reading, International Operations.......keep them coming, things change all the time (Regulations, Procedures, International Requirments etc.) and its great to get feed back from operators that do a lot of international operations. Some of this information was very helpful to me when I ran a small flight department for a short period.

I would like to see more articals in regards to tech. changes in the industry. FMS, GPS approaches,...where is the industry going and changing. Your Jepp Review section is great review material....again we used this for recurrent training material. CRM is another area that I would personally like to see more articals written about this subject.

What could be improved:

Profiling of Flight Departments-GV flyer was right on target. When you write up a department lets be PRO aviation-and not write information that puts down the profession. I understand that some departments do not want to be advertized.

Your salary survey is all over the place........I tried to get more accurate information from NBAA. It needs some refinement!! -

I like CapnVegetto post on "on the road" idea..........great IDEA!

Keep up the good work.....

 

[semperfido]

hey- i see a pic of the guy that gave me my first real job flying (24+ yrs ago) in the edition that just came out. that's twice i've seen him there. the first time he was on the cover and this time p.68. it's a small world in aviation community. good job pro pilot for helping a lazy pilot keep track of old friends

 

[Canucit]

great rag it is the best for the professional pilot and next in line is AIN
keep up the good work

 

[Gulfstream 200]

hey- i see a pic of the guy that gave me my first real job flying (24+ yrs ago) in the edition that just came out. that's twice i've seen him there. the first time he was on the cover and this time p.68. it's a small world in aviation community. good job pro pilot for helping a lazy pilot keep track of old friends

Orville or Wilbur?

.

 

[2000flyer]

Speaking of "receiving" an issue. I've always been curious why my issues arrive 14-21 days after our mx director gets his? This has been status-quo for nine years now.

????

2000Flyer

 

[G100driver]

Speaking of "receiving" an issue. I've always been curious why my issues arrive 14-21 days after our mx director gets his? This has been status-quo for nine years now.

????

2000Flyer

They know you Half of the time I never even get mine!

 

[semperfido]

Orville or Wilbur?

.

touche and i'm not that old...15 more to go

 

[Gulfstream 200]

touche and i'm not that old...15 more to go

I know...just couldn't resist...

.

 

[irapilot]

• Please stop the too heavy emphasis on law enforcement/homeland security/military. I understand why this is an area that PP thinks it needs to pay attention to but I think this area is way out of proportion for our industry. Occasionally is ok. Let’s not play into the FEAR thing too much, huh?
• Of course, like others have said most of these featured flight departments are pretty crappy, if you can’t find good ones let’s skip it.
• Clay Lacy – I have respect for the man to some degree but give us a break from the good ole boy network – please.
• There are a lot of truly professional pilots out there doing very hard work day in and day out, bush, freight, logging, whatever – I am always interested in them and their stories.
• I do like the technical articles; I am interested in more in depth stuff, things that I can apply. The future stuff is interesting but most of us aren’t on the cutting edge of whiz bang so it gets old after a while.
• I like the chart quiz in the front.

 

[hawkerjet]

I enjoy reading pro pilot magazine every month and suspect it could become a better mag with a little more competition. I too enjoy the chart quizzes in the beginning of the mag as well as the wx section done by Karsten, but mr lacy's selfless promotion of his company is annoying. While he has led a very exciting life, it seems pro pilot has enabled him to get all the free advertisement his company wants. his arm is truly longer than an orangutan's, because i haven't seen someone pat himself on the back nearly as much as he.
moving on... the profile of a flight department section definetely needs improvement. when i first started reading this mag, i would read with envy about these flight departments and the dream of one day working for one. well after about a year i got tired of them and wondered why you wouldn't highlight the average flight department that is doing well. by average i don't mean mediocre, i mean the flight department that has 3-7 airplanes that are over 20 years old and has to shop around for fuel because our boss won't just let us fly wherever and put the bill on multi serv or avcard without shopping price first. the flight department that has a pitbull on speed dial with simuflite constantly haggling over prices because wyvern and argus require this training. a flight department that is responsible and dynamic unlike that idiot hawker flight department they had a couple of months ago. i'm just starting to get on a roll now, but i'll digress and you can pm me if you'd like more. i'd suggest a 135 section that encompasses the needs of a majority of small operators .