furloughfodder
Membar
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2004
- Posts
- 508
B747-300 said:fodder:
Our chance to improve the pay, terms and conditions of both groups went out the window when Polar crews accepted a contract extension rather than negotiate at the same time as Atlas. You made it easy for management to whipsaw all of us and my expectations are now very low.
Again, you show your lack of knowledge. How can we negotiate at the same time as Atlas? The merged contract will be decided by an arbitrator, not negotiations. That is why we wanted to get our contract pay as close to yours as possible, so when the arbitrator mergers out two CBAs they are both as high as possible. That's why it baffles me that you wanted us to take the first offer on the table.
If you had a legitimate beef with some Atlas crews you should have acted professionally and responsibly:
1. Don't agree to "back to work" language that prohibits retaliation against Atlas crews if you have no intention of complying with the agreement.
It is an independent board that is investigating the 'scab' situation. Not the MEC.
2. Keep your feelings private. Don't publish a list or call anyone a scab until the process is complete.
I agree 100%, that is why you have never seen me call any Atlas pilot a scab. I have said several times on here that I hope ZERO PERCENT of the 160 Atlas guys they are investigating are found innocent.
3. Have someone impartial within ALPA examine all the evidence.
4. If the very high burden of proof is met, file charges.
5. ALPA will conduct an Article 8 hearing for those charged.
6. If the charges are upheld, then and only then is that individual a scab.
Points 3-6 are the process that is taking place right now. No one is calling anyone a scab yet. They are all being investigated. I hope none of them are shown to be scabs.
So I guess your answer to my question is that we should not have negotiated (after our contract had expired 2 years ago) and just taken the first offer the comapany put on the table?