Plane crash lies check this website out

[FinalApproach]

Talk about conspiracy theories...alot of work went into this...what are your thoughts...

http://www.passitkit.com/planes.

Back to my eggnog and 151...Merry Christmas...

 

[mattfish42]

link doesn't work

 

[FinalApproach]

Here's the link...

http://www.passitkit.com/planes.htm

 

[KigAir]

Talk about conspiracy theories...alot of work went into this...what are your thoughts...

http://www.passitkit.com/planes.

Back to my eggnog and 151...Merry Christmas...

The correct link is:

http://www.passitkit.com/planes.htm

 

[350DRIVER]

Pentagon Plane Still 'Missing' Say Some

What a complete and absolute joke. I have never thought such dumba$$es could exist until I read some of these outrageous claims..

too funny-

3 5 0

 

[fr0g]

Ahhh... the beauty of the internet.. people can post *anything*

 

[CrewDawg]

Looks like we need some chlorine for the gene pool. This might be worse than the chemtrail website.

 

[Flying Illini]

This might be worse than the chemtrail website.

I wouldn't be surprised if the same group of people were behind BOTH websites and ideas. Rediculous.

 

[bart]

Here is one from the site:

THE WTC WAS DESIGNED TO SURVIVE THE IMPACT
OF A BOEING 767, SO WHY DIDN'T IT?

The building in fact survived the impact very well. It did not survive the ensuing fire fueled by 1,000s of pounds of jet A.

 

[Chunk]

When was the first production 767? When were the towers built? If the towers came first, how could they be "designed to survive a 767 impact"?

 

[Timebuilder]

I remember reading that the towers were supposed to survive a 707 impact, not a 767. In the sixties, when the designs were being made, this was the largest civilian airliner, as I remember it.

They were being built while I was at NYU, and were completed in 1973, if memory serves.

 

[350DRIVER]

I remember reading that the towers were supposed to survive a 707 impact, not a 767. In the sixties, when the designs were being made, this was the largest civilian airliner, as I remember it.

C O R R E C T . The towers were never designed to survive a 767, no talk of that was ever made or expressed. It was intended to survive a 707.

Au revoir,


3 5 0

 

[350DRIVER]

The site is out of touch with reality, whoever designed the site and maintains it surely has way too much time on his hands.

Au revoir,

3 5 0

 

[Smoking Man]

Also it was only the impact that it was built to survive. The Discovery channel had a show with one of the engineers of the WTC, I have it on video. He also indicates that the fire from the fuel was not considered in the design of the buildings.