SEVEN
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2006
- Posts
- 1,563
FlyBunny said:So, you’re the one who STILL thinks that flying for a ‘major’ airline [skill wise] is different than flying for a regional or a corporate department? Hhhhmmmm….
Friend, do you believe that learning to fly a CRJ as a brand new F/O is less difficult than learning to fly as a brand new F/O on a 757?
How many times you want me to repeat…BA (perhaps the World’s only truly global and most successful international airline) has repeatedly blown your theory of high-time pilot out of the water. Did you also not know about the 28-year old 747-400 Captain for KLM? And the 23-year old female 757 F/O for BA who had only 300 hours of piston time? Oh…sure…you don’t…you are still caught up in ‘major airline’ requirements in the US.
So, how did you come up with the ‘scale’ to measure 9Es performance as one of the three worst regionals? I have never worked for them but, I have friends who have. I have friends who still are, I have friends who have upgraded and loving flying out of MSP, I have friends who tried to upgrade and didn’t make it, I have friends who are F/Os and Captains and they want to move on to something else. You’d find that in any regional airline.
Five years ago my friend couldn’t get an interview with Comair (F-14 pilot); recently he left to go to NetJets because he thought they sucked. Six years ago, ACA was the name in the game, but at this very time, they are auctioning every remaining piece of property and belonging. Right now Horizon sounds good, five years ago there was a mass exodus to Piedmont. Perhaps the most stable [financially] regional airline is American Eagle, but for some it’s the worst place to work as they have insanely long upgrade time. It would be impossible to come up with a sound ‘process of performance measurement’ that would judge each and every regional and major airline fairly. Personally, most of my friends who fly for Mesa seem to be the happiest bunch.
I haven’t changed my hours since the day I got a nasty PM from someone who scolded me for writing on this forum as a low time CFI. All I can say is that I just finished training on a plane (as a F/O) that has no mechanical input to the flight surfaces…and if you really want to find out…keep your ears and eyes open for a female from the Midwest, who works as a research assistant for a professor in the Pure Math department of a major Midwestern university as her full-time job, and flies for airlines as a hobby.
Ahhh…go ahead…enlightened us all about the United fuel-starving fiasco near PDX. While you’re at it, do educate us about the AA accident at Little Rock where both pilots decided to land with the TS on the field (many died – hope you won’t try to put a spin on it as it was a deliberate attempt – not a mistake). Particularly the one in 1982 when the two pilots took off without following proper procedure and ran (figure of speech) the 737 in to the bridge near DCA.
Yep, it was a blatant disregard for procedures in some cases, but again…what do you have to say about those ‘major’ airline crews who made even worst mistakes than these two comparatively low-time pilots. And please, just don’t get stuck reading the top three examples I gave…buy a book on ‘Air Accidents’ and read few others.
Contrary to your observations, I have read in detail about the accident…in the end you’d find out, when the dust settles, that there should NEVER have been a ‘core-lock’. Even if the crew made multiple mistakes, and there’s no excuse for it, engines SHOULD’VE restarted. The crew messed up, but the plane crashed because the engines DIDN’T restart. Try looking in to how desperately Bombardier is trying to figure out what could’ve prevented the ‘core lock’ – [pure] mathematical modeling will do it for them. And they are working on it. Expect a settlement in this case as Bombardier won’t have a leg to stand on in the end (and I repeat again that the 9E crew indeed is indirectly responsible for the accident]. In a marketing gimmick, Bombardier was too quick to specify Fl410 as the ceiling, but never thought of the scenario those two pilots put themselves in to.
Yep, the Captain on the Lear with almost zero [no such quantity in math unless you’re using figure of speech, which I think you are] didn’t realize the subtle depressurization, but there’s so much more to that accident than just low time pilots. While you’re at it, why don’t you look up the UAL PDX accident when not one, not two, but three flight-deck members were directly responsible for running out of gas. Compared to near-zero Lear experience in Payne Stewart accident, try figuring out the combined total of the UAL/PDX crew on that particular airplane. You’d be surprised.
Besides, you should be unhappy that others died too. Just because PS was a celebrity, his life wasn’t wroth more than anyone else. Or less worth than the others. But, thanks for sharing your close encounter with PS: I once shook hands with Arnold Palmer’s caddie too.
Ummmmmm….here you go again. How can you quantify ‘MORE experience’?
Ever heard of ‘1,500 flight total hours or one hour flown 1,500 times’? But, I know you really go by what majors say. It’s OK.
Wow…talk about contradicting yourself. Now you say it’s a ‘…DECENT place to get some CRJ experience…’; isn’t that what we’re all doing…working for the current outfit to get some ‘DECENT’ flight time so we can move on? So, what’s your point from here on?
And UAL was supposed to fade away and Independence Air was going to give Jet Blue a serious run for their money. In the end what would happen is what the ‘management’ decide to do. This is one industry I wouldn’t bet one dollar on.
Bunny
I don't think your reply was long enough. Next time try and elaborate just a little bit more.