Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pinnacle stock down 25%

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Yhea ALP has experience with fatal accident investigation at Pinnacle. After all this is the SECOND fatal accident for this organization.

So out of 4 fatal accidents involving the regionals, Pinnacle has had TWO!

Think there may be a reason?

Congratulations!..you win the duesche of the month award....if you have such a problem and think its such an unsafe operation, let us know your name and dont ever ask for a jumpseat....thanks for such a classy comment in the midst of an extremely unfortunate event..
 
The title says it all.

Let's get back to the topic of the thread.

1. I doubt the Colgan situation had anything to do with the stock price of Pinnacle--very few could make the connection.

2. In case you've been in hibernation, all airline stocks are down.

3. However, the cap rate makes them a prime target for acquisition, as they have long term value with their contracts with NWA/Delta.

4. I am quite sure the stock price has caught someone's attention in southern Utah that is sitting on a Ft. Knox pile of cash!

5. However, should the stock price drop much further, it may be to the benefit of their Mainline partner to do a stock swap and acquire them without the outlay of one penny. Why? Because it could be quite possible from a cost standpoint, that acquiring them through a stock trade, and then owning the contract, would be a cheaper way to dispose of more 50 seat flying, without the threat of a lawsuit for abbrogating a 15 year, or what's left of it, contract.

6. It amounts to a very cost efficient way to BUY-OUT a contract.

7. This raises the question: How much would it cost to do the same at Mesa at 4 cents a share? And then--POOF, vaporized!

8. Actually, the Mainline partner would only have to acquire a controlling interest--not the whole enchilada!
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom