Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pinnacle CRJs

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Good points. I am new to the high speed/altitude stuff, so I may be off base...

I thought that as altitude and mach number increase, stall AOA decreases due to mach tuck....?
 
MarineGrunt said:
I thought that as altitude and mach number increase, stall AOA decreases due to mach tuck....?

I haven't cracked Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators in many years but as I recall mach tuck is a phenomenon associated with movements of the Center of Pressure(CP) over(or, more specifically, under) the airfoil and control surfaces due to local supersonic airflow. If so, it has nothing to do with stall AOA.
 
JetDriverWanaBe said:
Any one know the Critica Angle of Attack for the CRJ-200? It's an interview question that I just can't seem to find the answer for.


This isn't going to answer your question but the wing on the CRJ stalls at varying AOA's as you progress down its span. The outer few feet of the wing actually stalls quite frequently while in the normal flight envelope. This posed a problem during flight testing as the ailerons were stalling and unable to provide adequate roll control while operating in the higher AOA range. Instead of redesigning the wing to eliminate this problem Bombardier instead moved the ailerons inward so that the outer 3 feet or so of the wing don't have control surfaces on them.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom