Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pilot wins lawsuit against Bombardier Flexjet

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

luckydog

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
295
(it's also posted under the "Rolling Rest" thread but deserves it's own headline)

Fresh from the Dallas Morning News...

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcon...flexjet_09bus.ART.State.Edition1.38ac8d1.html
[SIZE=+2]Pilot wins lawsuit against Bombardier Flexjet[/SIZE]


[SIZE=+1]Firm used deceptive practices, jury finds[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]1200 AM CST on Saturday, February 9, 2008[/SIZE]


[SIZE=-1]By ERIC TORBENSON / The Dallas Morning News [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1][email protected] [/SIZE]

A Dallas jury has found Bombardier Flexjet's contract with a former pilot unenforceable, saying the Richardson-based private jet company used deceptive practices in promising pilots promotions and training.
Flexjet, which sells private jet service, sued Allen Miller of Plano in October 2005 for failing to repay a portion of his training costs after he flew for the company for 17 months starting in April 2000. The pilots' contract stated that pilots who left the company before working 24 months would repay a portion of their training costs, or $5,280 in Mr. Miller's case.
Mr. Miller, 52, countersued, arguing that Flexjet had falsely promised rapid promotions for new pilots and training that would help them get their official rating quickly on various types of corporate jets.
"These promises turned out to be lies," he said, especially the part about becoming a captain and earning more than $50,000 a year, well above the initial pay of $32,000 a year. "We were cheap labor to them."
In an interview, Mr. Miller said he thought it was particularly deceptive that the company emphasized to its customers that for safety reasons both captain and co-pilot would be fully rated on the planes flown. "I flew their planes for 17 months without my type rating," he said.
Calls for comment to Flexjet's spokeswoman and Jones & Davis attorney Chad Berry, who represented Flexjet in the case, weren't returned Friday.
The jury returned its verdict Monday, finding that the contract was invalid and that Flexjet had used deceptive trade practices, said Rob Wiley, attorney for Mr. Miller.
However, the jury awarded Mr. Miller no damages in his countersuit against Flexjet, and he probably will have to bear his own legal costs.
Mr. Miller estimated his legal expenses were about $70,000, but he believes he's among the very first pilots to successfully challenge Flexjet's pilot contract.
"It was a real education for me," he said.
Flexjet's Richardson operations employed 809 people last year, according to information from the company. Mr. Miller now flies for Netjets Inc. of Woodbridge, N.J., which is owned by Berkshire-Hathway Inc.
 
Last edited:
I think I would have just paid the $5000 and said the hell with it, I'm going to Netjets. Now he has to pay his lawyer $70k!
 
(it's also posted under the "Rolling Rest" thread but deserves it's own headline)

Fresh from the Dallas Morning News...

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcon...flexjet_09bus.ART.State.Edition1.38ac8d1.html
[SIZE=+2]Pilot wins lawsuit against Bombardier Flexjet[/SIZE]


[SIZE=+1]Firm used deceptive practices, jury finds[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]1200 AM CST on Saturday, February 9, 2008[/SIZE]


[SIZE=-1]By ERIC TORBENSON / The Dallas Morning News [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1][email protected] [/SIZE]

A Dallas jury has found Bombardier Flexjet's contract with a former pilot unenforceable, saying the Richardson-based private jet company used deceptive practices in promising pilots promotions and training.
Flexjet, which sells private jet service, sued Allen Miller of Plano in October 2005 for failing to repay a portion of his training costs after he flew for the company for 17 months starting in April 2000. The pilots' contract stated that pilots who left the company before working 24 months would repay a portion of their training costs, or $5,280 in Mr. Miller's case.
Mr. Miller, 52, countersued, arguing that Flexjet had falsely promised rapid promotions for new pilots and training that would help them get their official rating quickly on various types of corporate jets.
"These promises turned out to be lies," he said, especially the part about becoming a captain and earning more than $50,000 a year, well above the initial pay of $32,000 a year. "We were cheap labor to them."
In an interview, Mr. Miller said he thought it was particularly deceptive that the company emphasized to its customers that for safety reasons both captain and co-pilot would be fully rated on the planes flown. "I flew their planes for 17 months without my type rating," he said.
Calls for comment to Flexjet's spokeswoman and Jones & Davis attorney Chad Berry, who represented Flexjet in the case, weren't returned Friday.
The jury returned its verdict Monday, finding that the contract was invalid and that Flexjet had used deceptive trade practices, said Rob Wiley, attorney for Mr. Miller.
However, the jury awarded Mr. Miller no damages in his countersuit against Flexjet, and he probably will have to bear his own legal costs.
Mr. Miller estimated his legal expenses were about $70,000, but he believes he's among the very first pilots to successfully challenge Flexjet's pilot contract.
"It was a real education for me," he said.
Flexjet's Richardson operations employed 809 people last year, according to information from the company. Mr. Miller now flies for Netjets Inc. of Woodbridge, N.J., which is owned by Berkshire-Hathway Inc.


OHH!!! WOOOOOW IDIOT!!!! SO IT TOOK YOU ALMOST 8 YEARS TO WIN $5280.

NOW YOUR NEW BALANCE IS $70.000
AND YOUR POINT ISSSSS????
 
Good for him I'm glad this guy put up a fight. and besides, on a NJ salary he can afford it

and more importantly, how much did flexjet waste going after $5,000 from this guy? was THAT worth it?
 
Last edited:
OHH!!! WOOOOOW IDIOT!!!! SO IT TOOK YOU ALMOST 8 YEARS TO WIN $5280.

NOW YOUR NEW BALANCE IS $70.000
AND YOUR POINT ISSSSS????

He just set legal precedence so that if anyone else wants to challenge it they are at a much better starting point. May not be good for him but in the bigger picture it is good for others.
 
He just set legal precedence so that if anyone else wants to challenge it they are at a much better starting point. May not be good for him but in the bigger picture it is good for others.

I don't know about that. I'm having some contract issues with a former part 134 & 1/2 and it seems each case has to be looked at individually. Lawyer said, "generally if you can't prove wrong doing which forces you to leave negating the contract they typically hold up." Looks like Flex didn't hold up their end of the contract in his specific case.

Good luck to anyone fighting a training contract. I think they're a disgusting part of our industry and once I have my law degree I will fight any pilot training contract case pro-bono.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top