Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Piedmont will NOT get Q400s

  • Thread starter Thread starter mu2
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 2

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

mu2

Real Men Fly Props
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Posts
191
Kirby said it himself. Listen to the State of the Airline on The Hub. At about the 45 minute mark Kirby said the Q400 will not help anything right now and would most likley hurt US. He continued and talked about we don't need to add capacity, we need to reduce it at a time like this. They can't get out of the CRJ-200s so the Q400 won't happen.

This is not my opinion. Scott Kirby said it himself. Take a minute to listen.
 
Kirby said it himself. Listen to the State of the Airline on The Hub. At about the 45 minute mark Kirby said the Q400 will not help anything right now and would most likley hurt US. He continued and talked about we don't need to add capacity, we need to reduce it at a time like this. They can't get out of the CRJ-200s so the Q400 won't happen.

This is not my opinion. Scott Kirby said it himself. Take a minute to listen.

Any chance of stealing and posting it online with a link?
 
From the Conference Call:

Discuss....

Jamie Baker - JPMorgan

Good morning, everybody. First question I guess for Scott; I know there is a minimum main line fleet requirement in your ALPA contract. I see that you are moving a little bit closer to that with today’s 737 announcements but it isn’t clear to me what sort of flexibility you still have on the regional side. Are you already at contractual minimums with those contracts, or is there more downsizing you can do in that regard?

J. Scott Kirby

The only downsizing we can do of any material amount is reducing utilization. We have a couple percent more that we can go on the main line in terms of fleet and we can go several more percent in terms of reducing aircraft utilization, some of which you will see starting in September that we’ll be reducing utilization.

On the regional side, we have significant flexibility with our turbo prop operations, of which we have about 70 aircraft. Our RJ -- we could reduce that as much as we want and on the RJ operation, we are contractually limited. I mean, we are at our core minimums, though we could reduce utilization more.



Mary Schlangenstein - Bloomberg News

I had two quick questions; United has sought a one-year delay in the start of their San Francisco to China flight because of the fuel prices and I wondered if you guys are considering something similar.

And the second question is, is there any possibility that could go to your pilots and seek some kind of a side agreement or a waiver on the fleet minimums, Scott?

J. Scott Kirby

On China, we are still looking at it and that includes actually talking to our pilots about flying to China. And we could go see that but haven’t done that yet. I’m not sure how much progress we would make if we went and asked for a waiver but we have not done that to date.

Mary Schlangenstein - Bloomberg News

Okay, but it is a possibility if you -- you could try at least to negotiate it?

J. Scott Kirby

You can always ask.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top