3
350DRIVER
cjh-
Then I guess many many DE's are in "error" as well for doing this flight in actual IMC.. - I think not, look at the regulations once again more closely then go back and re-read what I wrote. The DE can (if he is willing) file IFR and act as PIC to do the ride in "actual"- perfectly legal and pretty common practice. As in most cases certain stipulations are applicable.
Suggest otherwise.?? Looks like you neglected to read what I wrote initially- Everything that I stated was not in error, ( I just neglected to go into a full explanation) and you are a CFII.?? I have yet to meet one pilot who did not log the checkride as PIC that was done under simulated conditions.
Pretty much common sense, now go back and read what I wrote.... Obviously the flight in "actual" must be filed by the DE and under his name BUT the applicant can and DOES log the ride as PIC "still" under certain situations. WHY?? Because the DE can state that the checkride was passed at a certain point during the flight and IF this happens before (prior to) entering IMC then guess what?? - HE is now "authorized" to fly into IMC. Many DE's will state that an applicant has passed the ride and for the "added" experience he will take the "applicant" into actual. This is a pretty common practice in the northeast due to the large amounts of "actual" that we get yearly.
Most of the DE's will still have want a flight plan filed regardless of if it is "actual" or severe vfr, in the remarks section some will want different remarks put in there. In simulated conditions (under the hood or foggles) the applicant is still PIC since he is appropriately rated in the aircraft.
3 5 0
Bottom line, 350 is in error,
Then I guess many many DE's are in "error" as well for doing this flight in actual IMC.. - I think not, look at the regulations once again more closely then go back and re-read what I wrote. The DE can (if he is willing) file IFR and act as PIC to do the ride in "actual"- perfectly legal and pretty common practice. As in most cases certain stipulations are applicable.
Until you are instrument rated, you may NOT act as PIC on any flight being conducted under an IFR flight plan. You may not file an IFR flight plan until you are an instrument rated pilot. There are no exceptions to 61.3 for check rides. 350 is in error to suggest otherwise
Suggest otherwise.?? Looks like you neglected to read what I wrote initially- Everything that I stated was not in error, ( I just neglected to go into a full explanation) and you are a CFII.?? I have yet to meet one pilot who did not log the checkride as PIC that was done under simulated conditions.
The DE would have to do the filing and agree to act as PIC for that portion of the flight for it to be legal
Pretty much common sense, now go back and read what I wrote.... Obviously the flight in "actual" must be filed by the DE and under his name BUT the applicant can and DOES log the ride as PIC "still" under certain situations. WHY?? Because the DE can state that the checkride was passed at a certain point during the flight and IF this happens before (prior to) entering IMC then guess what?? - HE is now "authorized" to fly into IMC. Many DE's will state that an applicant has passed the ride and for the "added" experience he will take the "applicant" into actual. This is a pretty common practice in the northeast due to the large amounts of "actual" that we get yearly.
Most of the DE's will still have want a flight plan filed regardless of if it is "actual" or severe vfr, in the remarks section some will want different remarks put in there. In simulated conditions (under the hood or foggles) the applicant is still PIC since he is appropriately rated in the aircraft.
3 5 0