Stearmandriver
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2003
- Posts
- 249
pa56pa said:Uhmmm... LOL
Noooooo..... sounds like you're talking logistics... but they're both still a prerequisite to getting hired, and a form of PFT
In PFT, the company requires you to pay for training that FlightSafety or Simuflite provides (SIC checkout or type rating), in Casper's case, $15K.
At SWA, it is a prerequisite just like a typical trashy charter company, but you still have to pay for it somehow prior to being accepted, $8K.
So what is the difference?? Is your point the fact that the charter company pockets a profit from PFT?
PA56, FalconCapt. is right. Do you know how many furloughed USAir guys (who know darn well they're never going back) have taken their 737 type over to SWA? Did these guys "pay for training?" Nope, not one bit. They never paid for their 737 types, and SWA paid for their SWA training in full. Compare this with a guy I know who was hired at Coex around a year before me (when new-hires still had to PFT): he was coming from a freight company and already HAD a type in the E120, yet when he was hired into the 120 at CoEx he had to plunk down ten grand for CoEx training on an aircraft he was ALREADY TYPED IN. (And yes I'd agree that this was dumb, I'm just using it as an example of REAL PFT.)
But unfortunately there are far too many people out there who just don't get why PFT is such a dumb thing; the booming business that places like Commutair, Mesa academy, TabExpress etc. do is proof enough of this. I'm not real familiar with how common it is on the corporate side of things as the only corporate jobs I'm applying for are the types of places that wouldn't require PFT. And God but that sounded elitist; let me qualify it by saying that I have a pretty good job now, flying good equipment and accruing good time, and so I can afford to be picky. I've got alot of friends who can't, and believe me I sympathize. However, even my out-of-work friends have turned down PFT jobs. I've got nothing but admiration for that.
Joe