Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Petition the Air Force Tanker Contract

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Lets see if this works...

I'd rather have a US company win this...but I have been in the USAF long enough..and flown enough aircraft with mods....and enough new aircraft to know we don't need crews saying "well..it's a ____ but we wish it worked..or we wish we could do THIS.."
We need them flying the equipment they need to get the job done...well.
Scroll down to page two - spider chart.

http://www.leeham.net/filelib/ScottsColumn030408_2.pdf
 
Said by a dude that flies a Canadair Regional Jet.

Yep - And I get paid more than a Skybus Captain flying an Airbus. The CRJ is no Boeing but there's no place else to start.

Airbus has destroyed the US Airline industry; giving airplanes to anyone (Independence, Skybus, Jetblue), with easy payment plans and maintenance coverage. It is cheaper for Jetblue to get a new plane than do a C-Check. This allows cheapy carriers with no cost to charge $10 airfares and takes business away from the legacy carriers that pay pilot well.

Can you honestly tell me you want to support a company that is indirectly yet significantly hurting our industry?
 
Yep - And I get paid more than a Skybus Captain flying an Airbus. The CRJ is no Boeing but there's no place else to start.

Airbus has destroyed the US Airline industry; giving airplanes to anyone (Independence, Skybus, Jetblue), with easy payment plans and maintenance coverage. It is cheaper for Jetblue to get a new plane than do a C-Check. This allows cheapy carriers with no cost to charge $10 airfares and takes business away from the legacy carriers that pay pilot well.

Can you honestly tell me you want to support a company that is indirectly yet significantly hurting our industry?

Well, considering that Skybus just shut down today, that doesn't really mean much...
 
Can you honestly tell me you want to support a company that is indirectly yet significantly hurting our industry?

Archie Bunker -- it's 2008. Get over it. Roger and Me is sooooo 1980s.

If you want to peddle this holier than thou attitude of yours, than go live in a commune in the middle of nowhere and don't purchase ANYTHING.

Competition is good for everyone in every industry.
 
Well, considering that Skybus just shut down today, that doesn't really mean much...

And pay wasn't the issue -- but then he doesn't get it. BTW, I wouldn't brag about making more than a 65/hr Skybus captain. That WAS a pitiful pay rate.

Thankfully ... I can now say was.
 
Yeah... there's nothing funny or interesting that I fly 60% less seats and make more.

Dear Friends,​
Thank you for voicing your opinion on my website about the outrageous decision by the Air Force to award a $35 billion contract to European Aeronautic Defence and Space (EADS)/ Northrop Grumman over Boeing to build the next generation of aerial refueling tankers. I hope you find this weeks "Tanker News" update informative.
On Wednesday, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) rejected effort's by the Air Force and Northrop Grumman to have portions of Boeing's Tanker protest bid thrown out. This means the GAO has agreed to look at all aspects of Boeing's protest without pre-maturely dismissing any part of the protest. This is great news and a good step forward.
I will continue to aggressively fight this decision in Congress. I am currently finalizing legislation that will help create a level playing field for American workers and manufacturers.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
This week, both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal reported that French Financial Market Regulator, Autorité des Marchés Financiers, has filed a formal complaint and requested a criminal investigation of the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS).
You can read the full story in the New York Times by clicking here.
It is clear that EADS cannot be trusted to build KC-X tankers for America – its history confirms this. The United States Air Force has kept America shielded from questionable, and in some cases illegal, activities that EADS and its parent Company Airbus have committed. Because the Department of Defense and the Air Force waived the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Cost Accounting Standards for foreign competitors, the American public may never know the true extent of illegal activities that our new KC-X Tanker manufacturer has committed. This represents a serious challenge to our national security.
Our American tanker needs to be built by a company we can trust. Our American tanker needs to be built by an American company with American workers.
Also, the Center for Security Policy just released a report, "EADS is Welcome to Compete for US Defense Contracts- But First it Must Clean Up Its Act", that highlights numerous past and present problematic issues that need resolved before EADS should be able to compete for American contracts.
Click here to read this fascinating report by the Center for Security Policy.
REGISTERING YOUR OPINION:
Thank you again for taking time to voice your opinion on my website. Please make sure your family and friends also know how to access the site to register their opinion as well. The more people who voice their disapproval of this Tanker contract decision the more momentum we will gain.

People from all over the United States have been voicing their outrage. As of this morning, more than 72,000 of you indicated you were outraged with the Air Force Tanker decision!
TANKER BLOG:
Be sure to check out the "Tanker Blog" to stay up to date on all the latest Tanker contract actions. Here I will post videos, media interviews, floor speeches, letters to the President, Secretary of Defense, and my Congressional colleagues that express my outrage over this contract.

In addition, if you would like to call the White House to voice your opinion about the Air Force tanker decision the number is 202-456-1111.
 
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
This week, both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal reported that French Financial Market Regulator, Autorité des Marchés Financiers, has filed a formal complaint and requested a criminal investigation of the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS).
You can read the full story in the New York Times by clicking here.
It is clear that EADS cannot be trusted to build KC-X tankers for America – its history confirms this. The United States Air Force has kept America shielded from questionable, and in some cases illegal, activities that EADS and its parent Company Airbus have committed. Because the Department of Defense and the Air Force waived the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Cost Accounting Standards for foreign competitors, the American public may never know the true extent of illegal activities that our new KC-X Tanker manufacturer has committed. This represents a serious challenge to our national security.
Our American tanker needs to be built by a company we can trust. Our American tanker needs to be built by an American company with American workers.
Also, the Center for Security Policy just released a report, "EADS is Welcome to Compete for US Defense Contracts- But First it Must Clean Up Its Act", that highlights numerous past and present problematic issues that need resolved before EADS should be able to compete for American contracts.
Click here to read this fascinating report by the Center for Security Policy.

Tell us, what was it Boeing was doing in 2002 that led up to this going to a bidded contract? While I would have preferred that Boeing had put together a winning package to win, their actions in this whole saga have not been exactly above board, so to bring up Airbus misdeeds as a reason they should not get it..well do you see the irony?
 
65K a YEAR. Get your facts right.

Typo. I guess, their pay rates aren't on apc anymore.

BTW -- How long have you been serving your country in the military?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top