tomgoodman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Posts
- 2,356
They know what they're doing
Leaving aside Frank Borman's exculpatory "gun" metaphor, I agree with you. Threatening a strike is what unions are supposed to do, or else contract negotiations become merely an exchange of opinions. But demographics don't change greatly during the term of a single CBA. It serves no good purpose for management or labor officials to sign an agreement which they know they cannot live up to, or which they simply have no intention of living up to. They do it to defer problems for others to solve, meanwhile keeping their executive jobs a while longer.
Maybe the unions held a gun to their head....It was either give in or a strike....Pensions and health care have been the topic that nobody really wants to address.
Social Security, Medicare, and medical/retirement costs are not sustainable due to the changing demographics and overly optimistic actuarial assumptions....
The problem remains on how to deal with people who were made promises that were never realistic in the first place.
Leaving aside Frank Borman's exculpatory "gun" metaphor, I agree with you. Threatening a strike is what unions are supposed to do, or else contract negotiations become merely an exchange of opinions. But demographics don't change greatly during the term of a single CBA. It serves no good purpose for management or labor officials to sign an agreement which they know they cannot live up to, or which they simply have no intention of living up to. They do it to defer problems for others to solve, meanwhile keeping their executive jobs a while longer.