Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Options Going Belly up....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I also have heard the same as Falcon Capt. about the fractionals reaping the most of their profit from the sales of shares as opposed to the operations... Someone with better information on this topic should chime in. Also could someone comment on the information coming out that fractional customers are starting to get scared by aircraft depreciation lately...
 
FLOPS = Value ?

Guess I do not understand value or financing. How could a company (FLOPS) have a value of 80-100 million as a previous poster states. Information that I have read leads me to me believe that FLOPS would have been in bankruptcy Sept. 2001 if Raytheon had not started loaning money. I believe that FLOPS would have for sure been in bankruptcy if Raytheon had not merged RTA with FLOPS and given FLOPS an additional loan of some 20 million.

I find it hard to believe that if I had a company worth 80 million that I could not get 20 million to pay off Raytheon. I am sure Ricci did not like stepping down as CEO. No my opinion is that FLOPS has a negative worth. Most of the value of the used airplanes (which are owned by the owners and not FLOPS) have lost much of there value. The owners at FLOPS are maybe the biggest losers.

With the book keeping at Raytheon/RTA it would be very difficult to determine if RTA was losing money or not. It is for sure that Raytheon wanted and I am sure they still would desire to sell all of the small aircraft business.
 
Raytheon

To find out information on publicly held companies, go to the SEC. EDGAR site. For Raytheon try

http://investor.raytheon.com/edgar.cfm

I can't comment on the accounting principals used, but the information is available for all that wish to read it.

It is difficult to make money in aviation. I believe this is true for fractional, airlines and charter companies alike. The fixed costs (salaries, benifits, insurance, buildings, utilities) have risen dramaticly over the past two years while the value of assets (aircraft) have dropped. Fees have not kept pace with costs.

The variable costs are going up, too. I saw a wholesale increase of 12 cents per gallon last Monday.
 
Well Mike what is that old saying that figures don’t lie but liars do figure. The numbers from RTA were somewhat inflated due to many ways of accounting and allocation. RTA was reported to pay more at Raytheon for every item it received from aircraft to fuel than did the others such as EJA.

Do not doubt that RTA, EJA or any company has or could lose money. In RTA case because of the accounting I do doubt the reported lost as being an accurate number. I do believe that Raytheon has been call because of their accounting procedure for about a four year period. Not another Enron but some possible trouble.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom