I hope that next time the government wants to cut firefighting funds in order to bomb a third world country, they'll remember this moment.
Personally, I've never liked standing alert at a tanker base and watching a 40,000' column of smoke build...and never getting the call.
Verdict this morning after making repeated flights down there after the last few days...they don't need the tanker. So it sits, and I'm doing other things. Go figure.
A few years ago I sat at BIL in a 4Y, and watched as 17 lightening fires put out large black columns of smoke to the North. We watched the fires burn all morning and after noon. Nobody wanted to spend the money to put a tanker on it...the firest were still on private land, and nobody was willing to pony the dough. At 1500, 40+ knot winds were pushing the fires, and they merged, and moved through several towns. When we did get the call, fire was everywhere, and we couldn't even find the town. When we did find structures, they were on fire, and we were cleared to begin dropping on bridges, houses, anything that we saw burning. It was rough, dangerous, and they risked our lives in a futile battle because they thought it was too expensive to stop in the early stages.
Isn't this always the case.
It's worth noting in passing that the first fatality of this fire was Tanker 99 with two dedicated crewmembers aboard, dispatched to San Bernadino just before this whole thing blew up.
I wish I was down there in the basin dropping now...but the tanker will sit, and I will work my services elsewhere. I hope those not using the tanker are willing to explain it to the families of the deceased, and the homeless.
Typical.
As an aside, does anybody remember the terrorist alert received this summer regarding the setting of fires? We were notified that credible intel had been produced that large fires were to be set this year, as a terrorist act.
Personally, that's the biggest fire I've ever seen...certainly in Region V (SoCal).