Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Oil Prices Squeeze Airlines, Except SWA

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

canyonblue

Everyone loves Southwest
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
2,314
Oil Prices Squeeze Airlines, But Southwest Can Gloat


By Elizabeth Souder, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--As oil prices head toward $40 a barrel Thursday, squeezing transportation company profits, one petroleum user is sitting pretty: Southwest Airlines Co.

The Dallas airline has hedged more than 80% of its fuel needs for the next two years at a price of $24 a barrel. And Southwest is the only U.S. carrier to have hedged most of its fuel.

How important are those fuel hedges for Southwest? "It's huge," said Chief Executive Jim Parker in an interview with Dow Jones Newswires earlier this week.

That foresight was the reason Southwest turned a profit in the first quarter, while other airlines bled due to high fuel costs and depressed air fares. Without the hedges, Southwest's profit of $26 million would have been a loss of $8 million.

And the hedges have allowed Southwest to keep its air fares low, thus putting the squeeze on competitors as they attempt to add fuel surcharges. Various airlines have made about a dozen attempts in the last few months to impose blanket fare increases, but stiff competition makes it difficult to pass fuel cost rises along to passengers.

So why aren't other airlines so well-hedged? The best-hedged have only locked in prices for around 30% of their fuel needs, while others waited so long that their hedged prices are nearly twice that of Southwest. Others have no hedges at all.

The problem is that buying hedges requires credit lines or cash, two things in short-supply for many airlines last year when Southwest was planning its fuel needs. Plus, the airline business has traditionally attracted executives who like to take risks, and are sometimes willing forego hedges in a bet that fuel prices will drop.

Hedging fuel prices involves buying futures contracts or other instruments to offset a possible rise in oil prices. Hedging can also be incorporated into an airline's fuel procurement program. Extensive hedging programs keep airlines' fuel costs stable and predictable, while small hedge programs at least insure that fuel prices won't cause an airline to go under.

Frank Shea, chief financial officer of World Fuel Services Corp, said airline executives are beginning to wise up about the importance of fuel hedges, but most are still exposed to a lot of risk.

"If you look at their financial statements it looks like the grin of an old- school hockey goalie - there are big black gaps in it," Shea said. "How many teeth got swallowed by hockey goalies before they started to wear a mask? What does it take to get people to protect themselves?"

AMR Corp American Airlines said in the past that every 1-cent increase in the price of a gallon of jet fuel translates into an additional $33 million annual cost for AMR. Continental Airlines Inc has said every $1 rise in the price of a barrel of oil boosts the airline's total fuel costs for the year by $38 million.

Both turned a loss in the first quarter.

AMR, which was on the brink of bankruptcy last year, liquidated its fuel hedges because it needed cash. Since then, the airline has made progress cutting costs, narrowing losses and beefing up liquidity. The high oil prices are slowing that progress, Chief Executive Gerard Arpey said in an interview with Dow Jones Newswires on Monday.

"I do think I'm pleased with the progress we've made this year, and if not for fuel prices...you would see more momentum being built into our plan," he said.

American has now hedged 16% of its second-quarter fuel and 6% of its second- half fuel at $32 a barrel and on Thursday announced a $2 fare increase to make up for the rising cost of fuel.

Other airline executives say they are stuck in a quandary: to buy expensive hedges, or to hope that oil prices will fall?

"Like many of the others, we are just looking for that window of opportunity," said Frontier Airlines Inc. Chief Executive Jeff Potter in an interview with Dow Jones last month. Frontier has hedged 7% of its fuel needs for the year.

Continental Airlines Inc. hadn't hedged fuel for this year because the airline expected prices to drop, and needed the money for other things. Now, Continental has capped its fuel price for the second quarter at $40 a barrel on 80% of its fuel, and has hedged about half of its fuel for the second half at prices between $32 and $40.

Delta Air Lines Inc. and US Airways Group Inc. liquidated some hedges in the first quarter for cash. It left Delta with no hedges for this year, and US Airways with no second-quarter hedges. US Airways has hedged 33% of its second-half jet fuel needs at a price of 83 cents a gallon.

World Fuel Services' Shea said he thinks there's another reason most airlines are poorly-hedged: the industry has traditionally attracted executives who like to take risks. Fuel-price insurance has never been part of the culture.

"Because this has been going on for so many decades, I kind of think it has become part of the industry. It's like wildcatters," Shea said. "It's a classic example of risk-prone entrepreneurs. They like risk, they seek risk."

The rise in oil prices caused airlines' shares to drop, with the some of the least-hedged airlines taking the biggest hits. Delta shares were down 5.9% at $ 5.76; AMR was down 5.6% at $11.56; US Airways was down 10% at $2.08. Southwest outperformed the industry, down 1.2% at $14.27.
 
Southwest will be able to buy a plane or two with the profit from hedging. Southwest knows successful growth is a game of inches.

How much are Airtran and JetBlue hedged?
 
You think US Air will be able to compete in PHL with SWA lowballing fares to gain business with those fuel prices?

You can stick a pitchfork in the Big U because they are done.
 
PurpleTail said:
You think US Air will be able to compete in PHL with SWA lowballing fares to gain business with those fuel prices?

You can stick a pitchfork in the Big U because they are done.

I say give them to the end of summer and its all over!! Couldn't imagine starting a career over at 40/50+!!!
 
Lots of pilots who are not retired military are "starting over" at SWA over 40 and even close to 50. Some aren't even furloughed, just employed at a carrier they deem to be vulnerable.

Same at JetBlue, ATA. Don't know about Airtran, but the smart pilots in need of work are applying there today.
 
My point was that those pilots at UAir will most likely loose their jobs after 10-30 yrs with the carrier - try starting over then, especially if you don't quite have enough time in to retire.
 
I would think that SWA, JBLU and others would love to hire 45-55 yr old pilots. Lots of time, lots of experience, and they would never cut deep into labor costs because they would never make it to max pay potential or retirement benefits...an employer's dream.

Kinda makes me want to go get my Master Degree or Real Estate licence.
 
a320driver, that is only half of the equation. in other words 40% hedged at $24 a barrell is alot different than 40% at $38 a barrell.
 
Why is it that a SWA or JBLU "Love" thread can be posted here and all anyone does is pile on the love?

If the General started a thread espousing some new route that Delta flew, there would be many people jumping in to dump all over him.......just because they (apparently) hate Delta.

But someone starts a thread basically bragging about how SWA is not affected by rising oil prices and all the responses seem to come from fawning wannabe SWA kittens.

Now, don't get me wrong....SWA is a great airline. I have a buddy who started there the same time I started at AA.....I'm furloughed and he's about a year or two from upgrading to captain. So, good on him and everyone else at SWA.

The problem is the vitriol and hatred I see directed at any airline that isn't hiring. Yes, AA isn't perfect but we also aren't the Anti-Christ. Can't you all take a step back and realize that the airline industry is cyclical? The airline that you call "evil" now may be the one hiring you in a few years.

Just because JBLU and SWA are hiring now does not make them the saviors of the industry.
 
Just saw an analyst on Bloomberg predict that oil may hit $50 a barrel by summer. :(
 
PurpleTail said:
I would think that SWA, JBLU and others would love to hire 45-55 yr old pilots. Lots of time, lots of experience, and they would never cut deep into labor costs because they would never make it to max pay potential or retirement benefits...an employer's dream.

Kinda makes me want to go get my Master Degree or Real Estate licence.

Good point - I never thought about that one.
 
Pilot141,
Can't you all take a step back and realize that the airline industry is cyclical? The airline that you call "evil" now may be the one hiring you in a few years.

Historically, with few exceptions, it doesn't really work that way. Usually the furloughed pilots get called back to their airline. There is not a massive exchange of pilots during cyclical times. Usually the exchange of pilots happens if an airline shutsdown which in the grand scheme of the history of the business does not happen very often. With the exception of many start ups I think the last major to go under was Pan Am in I believe 1991.

And in the event that this comment was specifically towards the Jetblue and Southwest crowd, I think few would argue successfully that these don't have legs to stand on.

SWAdude:cool:
 
It would not surprise me a bit if that analyst who says $50 a barrel this Summer is correct, or if it goes down to $25 a barrel in the same time frame. The only thing for sure is nobody knows. They all said it would go through the roof during the fighting last Spring and it never happened. One thing is sure, once you get past a a certain mileage in most parts of the country, it will be a lot cheaper to fly than drive this Summer. It takes a 20 to fill my Dodge Neon. Its all good! The moral of the story is - $40 a barrel plus nobody flying last Summer with war and SARS, bad. Never happened, thank goodness. $40 a barrel this Summer with pre 9-11 loads and the Asian business booming - sustainable.
 
That was the headline on the article. If I cut and paste I don't take the liberty, or the time, to make up a new headline. I don't gloat much, unless it's for the Red Wings. And after this early exit if you rip on the Wings then I would say F*ck Off!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top