Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Ode to the radial...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

crash-proof

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 10, 2002
Posts
782
Found this rant on anothe site, great sense of humor and very poetic in description...



Radial motors:

We gotta get rid of turbines, they are ruining aviation. We need to go back to big radial engines.

Anybody can start a turbine, you just need to move a switch from "OFF" to "START," and then remember to move it back to "ON" after a while. My PC is harder to start. Cranking a radial engine requires skill, finesse and style. On some planes, the pilots are not even allowed to do it.


Turbines start by whining for a while, then give a small lady-like poot and start whining louder. Radial engines give a satisfying rattle-rattle, click-click BANG, more rattles, another BANG, a big macho fart or two, more clicks, a lot of smoke and finally a serious ow pitched roar. We like that. It's a guy thing.


When you start a radial engine, your mind is engaged and you can concentrate on the flight ahead. Starting a turbine is like flicking on a ceiling fan: Useful, but hardly exciting.


Turbines don't break often enough, leading to aircrew boredom,
complacency and inattention. A radial engine at speed looks and
sounds like it's going to blow at any minute. This helps concentrate the mind.


Turbines don't have enough control levers to keep a pilot's attention.
There's nothing to fiddle with during the flight.


Turbines smell like a Boy Scout camp full of Coleman lanterns.
Radial engines, in the morning, smell like God intended flying
machines to smell.


:cool: :cool: :cool:
 
hmmm...you're right did a google search on the 1st sentence and got like 2000 results. Oh well, guess i'm not spendin enough time on the web. :rolleyes:
 
This relates to the other thread about what makes a "real Aviator"

The answer is simple, they fly real airplanes.


For those of you who can't figure it out, think about why I posted it here, and not in the other one.
 
NOTHING makes me happier than flying my T6 - what sublime pleasure...

For those that have never had the pleasure of sitting behing a 1340 or 985 - do it! Jets are for kids.
 
They are great engines and I enjoyed the several thousand hrs sitting behind them, but I'll take my Pt6 any day. It may not be as nostalgic or romantic but it doesn't have as big a habit of spitting out parts. I do have to admite that I miss the sound of the old engines. This was the first year in a long time that I didn't log any time in a radial engined airplane.
 
Cpt. Underpants said:
NOTHING makes me happier than flying my T6 - what sublime pleasure...

For those that have never had the pleasure of sitting behing a 1340 or 985 - do it! Jets are for kids.

Ig God had wanted man to fly behind a flat motor, Pratt Whitney would have built it!
 
True,

But then you don't have the pleasure of staying up all night changing out cylinders from lifted heads, replacing sections of the exhaust collector, and repairing or replacing the prop governor, hydromatic prop, cowl actuators, or refilling the 55 gallons of oil used during the day.

The PT6A is reliable, but boring. And really quiet. Too quiet...

(sound of a whistle in the background, and sagebrush goes tumbling by)
 
What's all the fuss about violins on TV?

No wonder my hearing ain't what it used to be: not enough PT6 time....

Dam TPE331 and R2800 has pretty much deafened me.

That IO520 probably takes some blame too.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top