Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NX Cub bounced landing (N69NX)

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Neal

Forums Chief Pilot
Staff member
Joined
Oct 31, 1996
Posts
1,631
Type aircraft owned
Carbon Cub FX-3
Base airport
KFCI
Ratings
COMM, IFR, MEL, SEL
The airplane landed hard, bounced in the air and impacted the runway. The pilot and passenger suffered minor injuries.
One source says destroyed, another says minor damage:


 
Cub Crafters made a good effort towards making the NX Cub idiot proof, but apparently some pilots take that as a challenge.
 
ASN links a photo showing the accident aircraft on amphib floats. I don't know the configuration of the aircraft at the time of the accident but NX makes no difference if floats are fitted.

I have only flown straight floats so no knowledge of how challenging an NX would be on amphibs.
 
The link below is the news channel which shows this photo. Looks like "minor" damage :(

https://www.wmur.com/article/plane-crash-plymouth-new-hampshire-2-hurt-06092026/71539082

Also appears tailwheel config, not nosewheel as expected. This is why we pay what we do...

nx.jpg
 
Ok, so not on floats, thanks.

I'd like to see a video of how that landing got stuffed up so badly. Quite a bit of energy needed to do that much damage on a nice grass strip.
 
Plymouth Fire press release here -


I did not find any other photos.
 
I'm curious - how many see any value in making practice wheel landings that progress to takeoff before tail lowering?

As a tail wheel instructor I thought wheel landings without tail lowering were of value only when introducing wheel landings. After the basics were understood I saw no value in making any landings that did not come to a full stop (or very close to a full stop) under control.

The FX-3 can be wheel landing at the same approach speed as for a 3 point landing. The transition to a wheel landing can happen after the 3 point landing flare has started. Why do so many insist on making high speed wheel landings?
What inspired this topic? I don't think any of the recent accidents outlined a landing technique or type? Something certainly to chat about maybe in another thread. Just curious why you asked?
 
So out of the blue on April 1, 2026 I received a text from the owner of N69NX and I honestly thought it was an April fools joke from one of my friends. The owner claimed to have 400 hours in N69NX in an Amphib configuration but recently converted it to tail wheel. In the text chain the owner included pictures of N69NX as an amphib, a pic as tailwheel plane, her ForeFlight 2025 annual summary and picture of herself (young Asian female).

She then asked me go up in my Carbon Cub SS ahead of her tailwheel transition training. I told her I wasn’t a CFI but I was happy to show her my plane and give her a ride… still 50% thinking this was an elaborate hoax.

Well she then went quiet for a while and then suddenly pinged me for landing advice. I would get texts like

“Do you have any tips for me about landing? A little bit gusty. Wheel landing and +10knots reduce one flap?“

I again told her that I wasn’t a CFI and she should get proper training. And I reminded her that her X Cub had Spring gear would bounce a lot more than a Cub on a full ACME suspension and she needed to get real proficiency. I got a few more texts asking again for landing advice and it was clear to me she had problems landing the plane without bouncing….

About a month later she said she had accumulated 100 hours of tailwheel and she asked me for airport camping spots.
 
It is amazing, I guess, that dealers and manufacturers will sell anyone a plane. Does anyone actually check if they're licensed, qualified or may be a threat to themselves or others? Something tells me this person probably wasn't insured either, or one could only hope! It's not helping the aviation community if people selling don't have some diligence to ensure the buyer is qualified.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom