Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NWA Freighter

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Like I said at the end of my post:

Whale Rider said:
However, I guess it all depends on how the bean counters crunch the numbers. ;)
I know NWA's decisions are based on its bean counters. But don't tell me that their decisions were based on the -200 being a better more effiecient plane than the -400.....that's just BS or Boeing wouldn't be building them.
 
Whale Rider said:
Like I said at the end of my post:


I know NWA's decisions are based on its bean counters. But don't tell me that their decisions were based on the -200 being a better more effiecient plane than the -400.....that's just BS or Boeing wouldn't be building them.
Whale,

I know it's nice to fly a shiny new plane, but many companies are finding it hard to make monthly payments on these 100+ million dollar aircraft. Boeing has seen a drastic drop in orders for brand new 747-400F coming off the assembly line, they are only completing previous commitments made to a couple of Asian carriers. The 747-400 pax to freighter conversion market is booming now, and that is the new trend, so don't be surprised if Boeing closes the 747-400F line.

Polar has even put one of its tired old -100's (858) back into service, because the plane is owned outright. Kalitta is doing the same thing, by purchasing every used up 747 that comes on the market, it makes good financial sense.
 
Ok, I,m going to explain this one last time then I'm done with this thread. In my original post I said that I was surprised that NWA.......NWA was converting -200's into frieghters. I'm thinking in terms of a company that has lots of $$$$. I know how it would be for Kalitta or Atlas or Polar or Evergreen to aquire/convert and pay for 747-400's, Its almost murder for them. But I'm not talking about them. I was only talking about NWA.

I will admit that I did make the mistake of saying that "any" company should not convert -200's into frieghters in my post. But to clear the air, I was only talking about NWA.
 
Whale Rider said:
Ok, I,m going to explain this one last time then I'm done with this thread. In my original post I said that I was surprised that NWA.......NWA was converting -200's into frieghters. I'm thinking in terms of a company that has lots of $$$$. I know how it would be for Kalitta or Atlas or Polar or Evergreen to aquire/convert and pay for 747-400's, Its almost murder for them. But I'm not talking about them. I was only talking about NWA.

I will admit that I did make the mistake of saying that "any" company should not convert -200's into frieghters in my post. But to clear the air, I was only talking about NWA.


Oh, We're talking about NWA ..................... My Bad!
 
Whale Rider,

What's the difference?

NWA already has the -200's, and they have been paid for several times over. One even took me to Korea 28 years ago.

OK, I have this 1977 Ford F100 Step Side that I love very much. I paid it off in 1980. I've been driving it and maintaining it ever since. In fact I have completely restored it twice over the years.

It now needs to have some major work done, again. I make $90K per year (not including per diem), so I can afford a new shiney F150 Crew Cab for $42K. Wait, though, the major work on my F100 will only cost me $2K, and will look like new, drive like new, and I can even add some state-of-the-art modern improvements to it.

The paid for (in 1980) F100 can't quite haul as much as the $42K F150, but I don't need it to for my normal loads. The old tech 351 in the F100 is the same size engine in the F150, but the old engine burns a little more gas than the new more efficient one. It would take me several years, though, to recover the difference between the two. I believe my captial is better put in saving for my age 60 retirement in nine years, so I chose to put my money where it will do more for me, and do the work on the F100, to include a new paint job.

Got the picture? Just because NWA may have more money than Atlas or Polar, doesn't mean that it wants to put out a couple of hundred million dollars over 20 million. Keeping cash in the bank makes more money than making payments.
 
Last edited:
Whale Rider ,
If it makes money now NWA does it.They compare all the cost of owning and operating an A/C and go from that.Cash is king and they plan to keep it.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom